03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to the same end, the invisible authority of superiors, the inward grace of sanctification,<br />

the supernatural virtues, and other gifts of grace.” 9 The former writer finds the soul of<br />

the Church in certain qualified persons, while the latter regards it as an all-pervading<br />

principle, something like the soul in man. But whatever Roman Catholics may be ready<br />

to grant, they will not admit that what may be called “the invisible Church” logically<br />

precedes the visible. Moehler says: “The Catholics teach: the visible Church is first,—<br />

then comes the invisible: the former gives birth to the latter.” This means that the<br />

Church is a mater fidelium (mother of believers) before she is a communio fidelium<br />

(community of believers). Moehler grants, however, that there is one sense in which<br />

“the internal Church” is prior to “the exterior one,” namely in the sense that we are not<br />

living members of the latter until we belong to the former. He discusses the whole<br />

subject of the relation of those two to each other in his Symbolism or Doctrinal<br />

Differences. 10 He stresses the identity of the visible Church with Christ: “Thus, the visible<br />

Church, from the point of view here taken, is the Son of God, everlastingly manifesting<br />

himself among men in a human form, perpetually renovated, and eternally young —<br />

the permanent incarnation of the same, as in Holy Writ, even the faithful are called ‘the<br />

body of Christ.’” 11<br />

2. THE GREEK ORTHODOX CONCEPTION. The Greek Orthodox conception of the<br />

Church is closely related to that of the Roman Catholics, and yet differs from it in some<br />

important points. That Church does not recognize the Roman Catholic Church as the<br />

true Church, but claims that honor for itself. There is but one true Church, and that<br />

Church is the Greek Orthodox. While it acknowledges with greater frankness than the<br />

Roman Catholics the two different aspects of the Church, the visible and the invisible, it<br />

nevertheless places the emphasis on the Church as an external organization. It does not<br />

find the essence of the Church in her as the community of the saints, but in the<br />

Episcopal hierarchy, which it has retained, while rejecting the Papacy. The infallibility of<br />

the Church is maintained, but this infallibility resides in the bishops, and therefore in<br />

the ecclesiastical councils and synods. “As invisible,” says Gavin, “she (the Church) is<br />

the bearer of divine gifts and powers, and is engaged in transforming mankind into the<br />

Kingdom of God. As visible, she is constituted of men professing a common faith,<br />

observing common customs, and using visible means of grace.” At the same time the<br />

idea is rejected of “an invisible and ideal Church, of which the various bodies of<br />

9 Handbook of the Christian Religion, p. 103.<br />

10 Chap. V, especially in the paragraphs XLVI-XLVIII.<br />

11 p. 59.<br />

623

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!