03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

linked up in such a way with the notion of an external and an internal covenant, that he<br />

comes dangerously near to the error of accepting two covenants, especially when he<br />

claims that during the <strong>New</strong> Testament dispensation God incorporates whole nations<br />

and kingdoms in the covenant.<br />

D. THE COVENANT AS A PURELY LEGAL RELATIONSHIP AND AS A<br />

COMMUNION OF LIFE.<br />

Reformed theologians, such as Kuyper, Bavinck, and Honig, speak of two sides of<br />

the covenant, the one external and the other internal. Dr. Vos uses terms that are more<br />

specific, when he distinguishes between the covenant as a purely legal relationship and<br />

the covenant as a communion of life. There is clearly a legal and a moral side to the<br />

covenant. The covenant may be regarded as an agreement between two parties, with<br />

mutual conditions and stipulations, and therefore as something in the legal sphere. The<br />

covenant in that sense may exist even when nothing is done to realize its purpose,<br />

namely the condition to which it points and for which it calls as the real ideal. The<br />

parties that live under this agreement are in the covenant, since they are subject to the<br />

mutual stipulations agreed upon. In the legal sphere everything is considered and<br />

regulated in a purely objective way. The determining factor in that sphere is simply the<br />

relation which has been established, and not the attitude which one assumes to that<br />

relation. The relation exists independently of one’s inclination or disinclination, one’s<br />

likes and dislikes, in connection with it. It would seem to be in the light of this<br />

distinction that the question should be answered, Who are in the covenant of grace? If<br />

the question is asked with the legal relationship, and that only, in mind, and really<br />

amounts to the query, Who are in duty bound to live in the covenant, and of whom may<br />

it be expected that they will do this? —the answer is, believers and their children. But if<br />

the question is asked with a view to the covenant as a communion of life, and assumes<br />

the quite different form, In whom does this legal relationship issue in a living<br />

communion with Christ? — the answer can only be, only in the regenerate, who are<br />

endowed with the principle of faith, that is, in the elect.<br />

This distinction is warranted <strong>by</strong> Scripture. It is hardly necessary to cite passages<br />

proving that the covenant is an objective compact in the legal sphere, for it is perfectly<br />

evident that we have such a compact wherever two parties agree as in the presence of<br />

God to perform certain things affecting their mutual relation, or one party promises to<br />

bestow certain benefits on the other, provided the latter fulfills the conditions that are<br />

laid down. That the covenant of grace is such a compact is abundantly evident from<br />

315

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!