03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that, and maintain that common grace <strong>by</strong> the illumination of the mind and the<br />

persuasive influence of the truth incites the sinner to accept Jesus Christ and to turn to<br />

God in faith and repentance, and will certainly achieve this end, unless the sinner<br />

obstinately resists the operation of the Holy Spirit. The Canons of Dort have this in<br />

mind where they reject the error of those who teach “that the corrupt and natural man<br />

can so well use the common grace (<strong>by</strong> which they understand the light of nature), or the<br />

gifts still left him after the fall, that he can gradually gain <strong>by</strong> their good use a greater,<br />

that is, the evangelical or saving grace, and salvation itself.” 21<br />

C. COMMON GRACE AND THE ATONING WORK OF CHRIST.<br />

The question naturally arises, whether the manifestation of common grace is in any<br />

way connected with the atoning work of Christ. As far as we know, Dr. Kuyper does not<br />

posit such a connection. According to him Christ as the Mediator of creation, the light<br />

that lighteth every man coming into the world, is the source of common grace. This<br />

means that the blessings of common grace flow from the work of creation. But this<br />

hardly suffices to answer the question, how it is to be explained that a holy and just God<br />

extends grace to, and bestows favors upon, sinners who have forfeited everything, even<br />

when they have no share in the righteousness of Christ and prove finally impenitent.<br />

The question is exactly, How can God continue to bestow those blessings of creation on<br />

men who are under the sentence of death and condemnation? As far as the elect are<br />

concerned this question is answered <strong>by</strong> the cross of Christ, but how about the<br />

reprobate? Perhaps it can be said that it is not necessary to assume a specific judicial<br />

basis for the bestowal of common grace on man in view of the fact (a) that it does not<br />

remove the guilt of sin and therefore does not carry pardon with it; and (b) that it does<br />

not lift the sentence of condemnation, but only postpones the execution. Perhaps the<br />

divine good pleasure to stay the revelation of His wrath and to endure “with much<br />

longsuffering vessels of wrath fitted unto destruction,” offers a sufficient explanation<br />

for the blessings of common grace.<br />

Reformed theologians generally hesitate to say that Christ <strong>by</strong> His atoning blood<br />

merited these blessings for the impenitent and reprobate. At the same time they do<br />

believe that important natural benefits accrue to the whole human race from the death<br />

of Christ, and that in these benefits the unbelieving, the impenitent, and the reprobate<br />

also share. In every covenant transaction recorded in Scripture it appears that the<br />

covenant of grace carries with it not only spiritual but also material blessings, and those<br />

21 III-IV. Rejection of errors 5.<br />

483

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!