03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

it is based on justification, in which the free grace of God stands out with the greatest<br />

prominence, excludes the idea that we can ever merit anything in sanctification. The<br />

Roman Catholic idea that justification enables man to perform meritorious works is<br />

contrary to Scripture. Justification as such does not effect a change in our inner being<br />

and therefore needs sanctification as its complement. It is not sufficient that the sinner<br />

stands righteous before God; he must also be holy in his inmost life. Barth has a rather<br />

unusual representation of the relation between justification and sanctification. In order<br />

to ward off all self-righteousness, he insists on it that the two always be considered<br />

jointly. They go together and should not be considered quantitatively, as if the one<br />

followed the other. Justification is not a station which one passes, an accomplished fact<br />

on the basis of which one next proceeds to the highway of sanctification. It is not a<br />

completed fact to which one can look back with definite assurance, but occurs ever<br />

anew whenever man has reached the point of complete despair, and then goes hand in<br />

hand with sanctification. And just as man remains a sinner even after justification, so he<br />

also remains a sinner in sanctification, even his best deeds continue to be sins.<br />

Sanctification does not engender a holy disposition, and does not gradually purify man.<br />

It does not put him in possession of any personal holiness, does not make him a saint,<br />

but leaves him a sinner. It really becomes a declarative act like justification.<br />

McConnachie, who is a very sympathetic interpreter of Barth, says: “Justification and<br />

sanctification are, therefore, to Barth, two sides of one act of God upon men.<br />

Justification is the pardon of the sinner (justificatio impii), <strong>by</strong> which God declares the<br />

sinner righteous. Sanctification is the sanctification of the sinner (sanctificatio impii), <strong>by</strong><br />

which God declares the sinner ‘holy’.” However laudable the desire of Barth to destroy<br />

every vestige of work-righteousness, he certainly goes to an unwarranted extreme, in<br />

which he virtually confuses justification and sanctification, negatives the Christian life,<br />

and rules out the possibility of confident assurance.<br />

3. TO FAITH. Faith is the mediate or instrumental cause of sanctification as well as of<br />

justification. It does not merit sanctification any more than it does justification, but it<br />

unites us to Christ and keeps us in touch with Him as the Head of the new humanity,<br />

who is the source of the new life within us, and also of our progressive sanctification,<br />

through the operation of the Holy Spirit. The consciousness of the fact that sanctification<br />

is based on justification, and is impossible on any other basis, and that the constant<br />

exercise of faith is necessary, in order to advance in the way of holiness, will guard us<br />

against all self-righteousness in our striving to advance in godliness and holiness of life.<br />

It deserves particular attention that, while even the weakest faith mediates a perfect<br />

597

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!