03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IV. Man in the Covenant of Works<br />

The discussion of the original state of man, the status integritatis, would not be<br />

complete without considering the mutual relationship between God and man, and<br />

especially the origin and nature of the religious life of man. That life was rooted in a<br />

covenant, just as the Christian life is today, and that covenant is variously known as the<br />

covenant of nature, the covenant of life, the Edenic covenant, and the covenant of<br />

works. The first name, which was rather common at first, was gradually abandoned,<br />

since it was apt to give the impression that this covenant was simply a part of the<br />

natural relationship in which man stood to God. The second and third names are not<br />

sufficiently specific, since both of them might also be applied to the covenant of grace,<br />

which is certainly a covenant of life, and also originated in Eden, Gen. 3:15.<br />

Consequently the name “Covenant of Works” deserves preference.<br />

A. THE DOCTRINE OF THE COVENANT OF WORKS IN HISTORY.<br />

The history of the doctrine of the covenant of works is comparatively brief. In the<br />

early Church Fathers the covenant idea is seldom found at all, though the elements<br />

which it includes, namely, the probationary command, the freedom of choice, and the<br />

possibility of sin and death, are all mentioned. Augustine in his de Civitates Dei speaks<br />

of the relation in which Adam originally stood to God as a covenant (testamentum,<br />

pactum), while some others inferred the original covenant relationship from the well<br />

known passage of Hos. 6:7. In the scholastic literature and in the writings of the<br />

Reformers, too, all the elements which later on went into the construction of the<br />

doctrine of the covenant of works were already present, but the doctrine itself was not<br />

yet developed. Though they contain some expressions which point to the imputation of<br />

Adam’s sin to his descendants, it is clear that on the whole the transmission of sin was<br />

conceived realistically rather than federally. Says Thornwell in his analysis of Calvin’s<br />

Institutes: “Federal representation was not seized as it should be, but a mystic realism in<br />

place of it.” 26 The development of the doctrine of the covenant of grace preceded that of<br />

the doctrine of the covenant of works and paved the way for it. When it was clearly<br />

seen that Scripture represented the way of salvation in the form of a covenant, the<br />

parallel which Paul draws in Rom. 5 between Adam and Christ soon gave occasion for<br />

thinking of the state of integrity also as a covenant. According to Heppe the first work<br />

which contained the federal representation of the way of salvation, was Bullinger’s<br />

26 Collected Writings I, p. 619. Cf. Calvin, Institutes II, 1.<br />

230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!