03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

under condemnation and therefore need the redemption which is in Christ Jesus.<br />

Children are never made an exception to this rule, cf. the preceding passages and also<br />

John 3:3,5; I John 5:12. This is not contradicted <strong>by</strong> those passages which ascribe a certain<br />

righteousness to man, such as, Matt. 9:12,13; Acts 10:35; Rom. 2:14; Phil. 3:6; I Cor. 1:30,<br />

for this may be either civil righteousness, ceremonial or covenant righteousness, the<br />

righteousness of the law, or the righteousness which is in Christ Jesus.<br />

C. THE CONNECTION OF ADAM’S SIN WITH THAT OF THE RACE.<br />

1. THE DENIAL OF THIS CONNECTION. Some deny the causal connection of the sin of<br />

Adam with the sinfulness of the human race either wholly or in part.<br />

a. Pelagians and Socinians deny absolutely that there is any necessary connection<br />

between our sin and the sin of Adam. The first sin was Adam’s sin only and does not<br />

concern his posterity in any way. The most they will admit is that the evil example of<br />

Adam led to imitation.<br />

b. Semi-Pelagians and the earlier Arminians teach that man inherited a natural<br />

inability from Adam, but is not responsible for this inability, so that no guilt attaches to<br />

it, and it may even be said that God is somewhat under obligation to provide a cure for<br />

it. The Wesleyan Arminians admit that this inborn corruption also involves guilt.<br />

c. The <strong>New</strong> School (<strong>New</strong> Haven) theory teaches that man is born with an inherent<br />

tendency to sin, in virtue of which his moral preference is invariably wrong; but that<br />

this tendency cannot itself be called sin, since sin always consists exclusively in<br />

conscious and intentional transgression of the law.<br />

d. The <strong>Theology</strong> of crisis stresses the solidarity of sin in the human race, but denies<br />

that sin originated in an act of Adam in paradise. The fall belongs to pre- or super-<br />

history, and is already a thing of the past when the historical Adam appears upon the<br />

scene. It is the secret of God’s predestination. The story of the fall is a myth. Adam<br />

appears as the type of Christ in so far as it can be seen in him that life without sin is<br />

possible in communion with God. Says Brunner: “In Adam all have sinned — that is the<br />

Biblical statement; but how? The Bible does not tell us that. The doctrine of original sin<br />

is read into it.” 40<br />

40 Man in Revolt, p. 142.<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!