03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

have reversed the order. Even Maccovius, Voetius, and Comrie, all Supralapsarians,<br />

follow the usual order. Several considerations prompted Reformed theologians in<br />

general to place calling before regeneration.<br />

a. Their doctrine of the covenant of grace. They considered the covenant of grace as the<br />

great and all-comprehensive good which God in infinite mercy grants unto sinners, a<br />

good including all the blessings of salvation, and therefore also regeneration. But this<br />

covenant is inseparably connected with the gospel. It is announced and made known in<br />

the gospel, of which Christ is the living center, and therefore does not exist without it.<br />

Where the gospel is not known the covenant is not realized, but where it is preached<br />

God establishes His covenant and glorifies His grace. Both the preaching of the gospel<br />

and the administration of the covenant precede the saving operations of the Holy Spirit,<br />

and the believer’s participation in the salvation wrought <strong>by</strong> Christ.<br />

b. Their conception of the relation between the work of Christ and that of the Holy Spirit.<br />

The Anabaptists failed to do justice to this relation. Christ and His redemptive work are<br />

presented to us in the gospel. And it is from Christ, as the Mediator of God and man<br />

and as the meritorious cause of our salvation, that the Holy Spirit derives everything<br />

which He communicates to sinners. Consequently, He joins His work to the preaching<br />

of the gospel and operates in a saving way only where the divine message of<br />

redemption is brought. The Holy Spirit does not work apart from the Christ presented<br />

in the gospel.<br />

c. Their reaction against the mysticism of the Anabaptists. The Anabaptists proceeded on<br />

the assumption that regeneration effected not merely a renewal of human nature, but an<br />

entirely new creation. And this being so, they regarded it as impossible that anything<br />

belonging to this natural creation as, for instance, the human language in which the<br />

Word of God is brought to man, could in any way be instrumental in communicating<br />

the new life to sinners. As they saw it, regeneration eo ipso excluded the use of the Word<br />

as a means, since this was after all only a dead letter. This mystical tendency was<br />

strongly opposed <strong>by</strong> Reformed theologians.<br />

d. Their experience in connection with the spiritual renewal of adults. While it was a<br />

settled opinion that covenant children who die in infancy are reborn and therefore<br />

saved, there was no unanimous opinion as to the time when those who grew up became<br />

partakers of the grace of regeneration. Some shared the opinion of Voetius that all elect<br />

children are regenerated before baptism, and that the new life can, even in adults,<br />

remain concealed for many years. The great majority, however, were loath to take that<br />

position, and held that the new life, if present, would reveal itself in some way.<br />

505

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!