03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IV. Sin in the Life of the Human Race<br />

A. ORIGINAL SIN.<br />

The sinful state and condition in which men are born is designated in theology <strong>by</strong><br />

the name peccatum originale, which is literally translated in the English “original sin.”<br />

This term is better than the Holland name “erfzonde,” since the latter, strictly speaking,<br />

does not cover all that belongs to original sin. It is not a proper designation of original<br />

guilt, for this is not inherited but imputed to us. This sin is called “original sin,” (1)<br />

because it is derived from the original root of the human race; (2) because it is present in<br />

the life of every individual from the time of his birth, and therefore cannot be regarded<br />

as the result of imitation; and (3) because it is the inward root of all the actual sins that<br />

defile the life of man. We should guard against the mistake of thinking that the term in<br />

any way implies that the sin designated <strong>by</strong> it belongs to the original constitution of<br />

human nature, which would imply that God created man as a sinner.<br />

1. HISTORICAL REVIEW. The early Church Fathers contain nothing very definite about<br />

original sin. According to the Greek Fathers there is a physical corruption in the human<br />

race, which is derived from Adam, but this is not sin and does not involve guilt. The<br />

freedom of the will was not affected directly <strong>by</strong> the fall, but is affected only indirectly <strong>by</strong><br />

the inherited physical corruption. The tendency apparent in the Greek Church finally<br />

culminated in Pelagianism, which flatly denied all original sin. In the Latin Church a<br />

different tendency appeared especially in Tertullian, according to whom the<br />

propagation of the soul involves the propagation of sin. He regarded original sin as a<br />

hereditary sinful taint or corruption, which did not exclude the presence of some good<br />

in man. Ambrose advanced beyond Tertullian <strong>by</strong> regarding original sin as a state and <strong>by</strong><br />

distinguishing between the inborn corruption and the resulting guilt of man. The free<br />

will of man was weakened <strong>by</strong> the fall. It is especially in Augustine that the doctrine of<br />

original sin comes to fuller development. According to him the nature of man, both<br />

physical and moral, is totally corrupted <strong>by</strong> Adam’s sin, so that he cannot do otherwise<br />

than sin. This inherited corruption or original sin is a moral punishment for the sin of<br />

Adam. It is such a quality of the nature of man, that in his natural state, he can and will<br />

do evil only. He has lost the material freedom of the will, and it is especially in this<br />

respect that original sin constitutes a punishment. In virtue of this sin man is already<br />

under condemnation. It is not merely corruption, but also guilt. Semi-Pelagianism<br />

reacted against the absoluteness of the Augustinian view. It admitted that the whole<br />

268

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!