03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and becoming subject to the power of death. The promise of life in the covenant of<br />

works was a promise of the removal of all the limitations of life to which Adam was still<br />

subject, and of the raising of his life to the highest degree of perfection. When Paul says<br />

in Rom. 7:10 that the commandment was unto life, he means life in the fullest sense of<br />

the word. The principle of the covenant of works was: the man that does these things<br />

shall live there<strong>by</strong>; and this principle is reiterated time and again in Scripture, Lev. 18:5;<br />

Ezek. 20:11,13,20; Luke 10:28; Rom. 10:5; Gal. 3:12.<br />

3. THE CONDITION OF THE COVENANT. The promise in the covenant of works was not<br />

unconditional. The condition was that of implicit and perfect obedience. The divine law<br />

can demand nothing less than that, and the positive command not to eat of the fruit of<br />

the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, relating as it did, to a thing indifferent in<br />

itself, was clearly a test of pure obedience in the absolute sense of the word. Man was, of<br />

course, also subject to the moral law of God, which was written on the tablets of his<br />

heart. He knew this <strong>by</strong> nature, so that it did not have to be revealed supernaturally, as<br />

the special test was. Essentially, the moral law, as Adam knew it, was undoubtedly like<br />

the ten commandments, but the form was different. In its present form the moral law<br />

presupposes a knowledge of sin, and is therefore primarily negative; in Adam’s heart,<br />

however, it must have had a positive character. But just because it was positive, it did<br />

not bring to his consciousness the possibility of sin. Therefore a negative commandment<br />

was added. Moreover, in order that the test of Adam might be a test of pure obedience,<br />

God deemed it necessary to add to the commandments of which Adam perceived the<br />

naturalness and reasonableness, a commandment which was in a certain sense arbitrary<br />

and indifferent. Thus the demands of the law were, so to say, concentrated on a single<br />

point. The great question that had to be settled was, whether man would obey God<br />

implicitly or follow the guidance of his own judgment. Dr. Bavinck says: “Het<br />

proefgebod belichaamde voor hem (Adam) het dilemma: God of de mensch, Zijn gezag<br />

of eigen inzicht, onvoorwaardelijke gehoorzaamheid of zelfstandig onderzoek, geloof of<br />

twijfel.” 31<br />

4. THE PENALTY OF THE COVENANT. The penalty that was threatened was death, and<br />

what this means can best be gathered from the general meaning of the term as it is used<br />

in Scripture, and from the evils that came upon the guilty in the execution of the<br />

penalty. Evidently death in the most inclusive sense of the word is meant, including<br />

physical, spiritual, and eternal death. The fundamental Scriptural idea of death is not<br />

that of extinction of being, but that of separation from the source of life, and the<br />

31 Geref. Dog., II, p. 618.<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!