03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

infinite distance between God and man apparently excluded a life of communion with<br />

each other, man was created for just such communion, and the possibility of it was<br />

already given in his creation in the image of God. In this natural relationship Adam was<br />

the father of the human race.<br />

b. The covenant relationship. From the very beginning, however. God revealed<br />

Himself, not only as an absolute Sovereign and Lawgiver, but also as a loving Father,<br />

seeking the welfare and happiness of His dependent creature. He condescended to<br />

come down to the level of man, to reveal Himself as a Friend, and to enable man to<br />

improve his condition in the way of obedience. In addition to the natural relationship<br />

He, <strong>by</strong> a positive enactment, graciously established a covenant relationship. He entered<br />

into a legal compact with man, which includes all the requirements and obligations<br />

implied in the creaturehood of man, but at the same time added some new elements. (1)<br />

Adam was constituted the representative head of the human race, so that he could act<br />

for all his descendants. (2) He was temporarily put on probation, in order to determine<br />

whether he would willingly subject his will to the will of God. (3) He was given the<br />

promise of eternal life in the way of obedience, and thus <strong>by</strong> the gracious disposition of<br />

God acquired certain conditional rights. This covenant enabled Adam to obtain eternal<br />

life for himself and for his descendants in the way of obedience.<br />

2. THE PROMISE OF THE COVENANT. The great promise of the covenant of works was<br />

the promise of eternal life. They who deny the covenant of works generally base their<br />

denial in part on the fact that there is no record of such a promise in the Bible. And it is<br />

perfectly true that Scripture contains no explicit promise of eternal life to Adam. But the<br />

threatened penalty clearly implies such a promise. When the Lord says, “for in the day<br />

that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die,” his statement clearly implies that, if<br />

Adam refrains from eating, he will not die, but will be raised above the possibility of<br />

death. The implied promise certainly cannot mean that, in the case of obedience, Adam<br />

would be permitted to live on in the usual way, that is, to continue the ordinary natural<br />

life, for that life was his already in virtue of his creation, and therefore could not be held<br />

out as a reward for obedience. The implied promise evidently was that of life raised to<br />

its highest development of perennial bliss and glory. Adam was indeed created in a<br />

state of positive holiness, and was also immortal in the sense that he was not subject to<br />

the law of death. But he was only at the beginning of his course and did not yet possess<br />

the highest privileges that were in store for man. He was not yet raised above the<br />

possibility of erring, sinning, and dying. He was not yet in possession of the highest<br />

degree of holiness, nor did he enjoy life in all its fulness. The image of God in man was<br />

still limited <strong>by</strong> the possibility of man’s sinning against God, changing from good to evil,<br />

235

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!