03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Church as an institution (also called apparitio and institutio) have their spiritual<br />

background in the invisible Church. However, though it is true that these are two<br />

different aspects of the one visible Church, they do represent important differences. The<br />

Church as an organism is the coetus fidelium, the communion of believers, who are<br />

united in the bond of the Spirit, while the Church as an institution is the mater fidelium,<br />

the mother of believers, a Heilsanstalt, a means of salvation, an agency for the<br />

conversion of sinners and the perfecting of the saints. The Church as an organism exists<br />

charismatic: in it all kinds of gifts and talents become manifest and are utilized in the<br />

work of the Lord. The Church as an institution, on the other hand, exists in an<br />

institutional form and functions through the offices and means which God has<br />

instituted. The two are co-ordinate in a sense, and yet there is also a certain<br />

subordination of the one to the other. The Church as an institution or organization<br />

(mater fidelium) is a means to an end, and this is found in the Church as an organism, the<br />

community of believers (coetus fidelium).<br />

C. VARIOUS DEFINITIONS OF THE CHURCH.<br />

The Church being a many-sided entity has naturally also been defined from more<br />

than one point of view.<br />

1. FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF ELECTION. According to some theologians the Church<br />

is the community of the elect, the coetus electorum. This definition is apt to be somewhat<br />

misleading, however. It applies only to the Church ideally considered, the Church as it<br />

exists in the idea of God and as it will be completed at the end of the ages, and not to<br />

the Church as a present empirical reality. Election includes all those who belong to the<br />

body of Christ, irrespective of their present actual relation to it. But the elect who are yet<br />

unborn, or who are still strangers to Christ and outside of the pale of the Church, cannot<br />

be said to belong to the Church realiter.<br />

2. FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF EFFECTUAL CALLING. To escape the objection raised to<br />

the preceding definition, it gradually became customary to define the Church from the<br />

point of view of some subjective spiritual characteristic of those who belong to it,<br />

especially effectual calling or faith, either <strong>by</strong> naming such a characteristic in addition to<br />

election, or <strong>by</strong> substituting it for election. Thus the Church was defined as the company<br />

of the elect who are called <strong>by</strong> the Spirit of God (coetus electorum vocatorum), as the body<br />

of those who are effectually called (coetus vocatorum), or, even more commonly, as the<br />

community of the faithful or believers (coetus fidelium). The first two of these definitions<br />

serve the purpose of designating the Church as to its invisible essence, but give no<br />

628

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!