03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dead, and of indulgences. As a protest against this ecclesiasticism, Chiliasm again made<br />

its appearance in several sects This was in part a reaction of a pietistic nature against the<br />

externalism and worldliness of the Church.<br />

3. FROM THE REFORMATION UP TO THE PRESENT DAY. The thought of the Reformation<br />

centered primarily about the idea of the application and appropriation of salvation, and<br />

sought to develop eschatology mainly from this point of view. Many of the old<br />

Reformed theologians treat it merely as an adjunct to soteriology, dealing with the<br />

glorification of believers. Consequently, only a part of eschatology was studied and<br />

brought to further development. The Reformation adopted what the early Church<br />

taught respecting the return of Christ, the resurrection, the final judgment, and eternal<br />

life, and brushed aside the crass form of Chiliasm which appeared in the Anabaptist<br />

sects. In its opposition to Rome, it also reflected a good deal on the intermediate state<br />

and rejected the various tenets developed <strong>by</strong> the Roman Catholic Church. It can hardly<br />

be said that the Churches of the Reformation did much for the development of<br />

eschatology. In Pietism Chiliasm again made its appearance. The Rationalism of the<br />

eighteenth century retained of eschatology merely the bare idea of a colourless<br />

immortality, of the mere survival of the soul after death. Under the influence of the<br />

philosophy of evolution with its idea of an endless progress, it became, if not obsolete,<br />

at least obsolescent. Liberal theology entirely ignored the eschatological teachings of<br />

Jesus and placed all the emphasis on His ethical precepts. As a result it has no<br />

eschatology worthy of the name. Other - worldliness made way for this - worldliness;<br />

the blessed hope of eternal life was replaced <strong>by</strong> the social hope of a kingdom of God<br />

exclusively of this world; and the former assurance respecting the resurrection of the<br />

dead and future glory was supplanted <strong>by</strong> the vague trust that God may have even<br />

better things in store for man than the blessings which he now enjoys. Says Gerald<br />

Birney Smith: “In no realm are the changes of thinking more marked than in the portion<br />

of theology which deals with the future life. Where theologians used to speak to us in<br />

detail concerning ‘last things,’ they now set forth in somewhat general terms the<br />

reasonable basis for optimistic confidence in the continuance of life beyond physical<br />

death.” 2 At the present time, however, there are some signs of a change for the better. A<br />

new wave of Premillennialism appeared, which is not limited to the sects, but has also<br />

found entrance in some of the Churches of our day, and its advocates suggest a<br />

Christian philosophy of history, based particularly on the study of Daniel and<br />

Revelation, and help to fix the attention once more on the end of the ages. Weiss and<br />

2 A Guide to the Study of the Christian Religion, p. 538.<br />

734

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!