03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART SIX:<br />

THE DOCTRINE OF THE<br />

LAST THINGS<br />

Introductory Chapter<br />

A. ESCHATOLOGY IN PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION.<br />

1. THE QUESTION OF ESCHATOLOGY A NATURAL ONE. A doctrine of the last things is not<br />

something that is peculiar to the Christian religion. Wherever people have seriously<br />

reflected on human life, whether in the individual or in the race, they have not merely<br />

asked, whence did it spring, and how did it come to be what it is, but also, whither is it<br />

bound? They raised the question, What is the end or final destiny of the individual; and<br />

what is the goal towards which the human race is moving? Does man perish at death, or<br />

does he enter upon another state of existence, either of bliss or of woe? Will the<br />

generations of men come and go in endless succession and finally sink into oblivion, or<br />

is the race of the children of men and the whole creation moving on to some divine telos,<br />

an end designed for it <strong>by</strong> God. And if the human race is moving on to some final, some<br />

ideal, condition perhaps, will the generations that have come and gone participate in<br />

this in any way, and if so, how; or did they merely serve as a thoroughfare leading up to<br />

the grand climax? Naturally, only those who believe that, as the history of the world<br />

had a beginning, it will also have an end, can speak of a consummation and have a<br />

doctrine of eschatology.<br />

2. THE QUESTION OF ESCHATOLOGY IN PHILOSOPHY. The question of the final destiny of<br />

the individual and of the race occupied an important place even in the speculations of<br />

the philosophers. Plato taught the immortality of the soul, that is, its continued<br />

existence after death, and this doctrine remained an important tenet in philosophy up to<br />

the present time. Spinoza had no place for it in his pantheistic system, but Wolff and<br />

Leibnitz defended it with all kinds of arguments. Kant stressed the untenableness of<br />

these arguments, but nevertheless retained the doctrine of immortality as a postulate of<br />

practical reason. The idealistic philosophy of the nineteenth century ruled it out. In fact,<br />

731

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!