03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

it is quite evident that philosophy can neither prove nor disprove the existence of<br />

angels. From philosophy, therefore, we turn to Scripture, which makes no deliberate<br />

attempt to prove the existence of angels, but assumes this throughout, and in its<br />

historical books repeatedly shows us the angels in action. No one who bows before the<br />

authority of the Word of God can doubt the existence of angels.<br />

C. THE NATURE OF THE ANGELS<br />

Under this heading several points call for consideration.<br />

1. IN DISTINCTION FROM GOD THEY ARE CREATED BEINGS. The creation of the angels has<br />

sometimes been denied, but is clearly taught in Scripture. It is not certain that those<br />

passages which speak of the creation of the host of heaven (Gen. 2:1; Ps. 33:6; Neh. 9:6)<br />

refer to the creation of the angels rather than to the creation of the starry host; but Ps.<br />

148:2,5, and Col. 1:16 clearly speak of the creation of the angels, (comp. I Kings 22:19; Ps.<br />

103:20,21). The time of their creation cannot be fixed definitely. The opinion of some,<br />

based on Job 38:7, that they were created before all other things, really finds no support<br />

in Scripture. As far as we know, no creative work preceded the creation of heaven and<br />

earth. The passage in the book of Job (38:7) teaches, indeed, in a poetic vein that they<br />

were present at the founding of the world just as the stars were, but not that they<br />

existed before the primary creation of heaven and earth. The idea that the creation of the<br />

heavens was completed on the first day, and that the creation of the angels was simply a<br />

part of the day’s work, is also an unproved assumption, though the fact that the<br />

statement in Gen. 1:2 applies to the earth only would seem to favor it. Possibly the<br />

creation of the heavens was not completed in a single moment any more than that of the<br />

earth. The only safe statement seems to be that they were created before the seventh<br />

day. This at least follows from such passages as Gen. 2:1; Ex. 20:11; Job 38:7; Neh. 9:6.<br />

2. THEY ARE SPIRITUAL AND INCORPOREAL BEINGS. This has always been disputed. The<br />

Jews and many of the early Church Fathers ascribed to them airy or fiery bodies; but the<br />

Church of the Middle Ages came to the conclusion that they are pure spiritual beings.<br />

Yet even after that some Roman Catholic, Arminian, and even Lutheran and Reformed<br />

theologians ascribed to them a certain corporeity, most subtle and pure. They regarded<br />

the idea of a purely spiritual and incorporeal nature as metaphysically inconceivable,<br />

and also as incompatible with the conception of a creature. They also appealed to the<br />

fact that the angels are subject to spatial limitations, move about from place to place,<br />

and were sometimes seen <strong>by</strong> men. But all these arguments are more than counter-<br />

balanced <strong>by</strong> the explicit statements of Scripture to the effect that the angels are<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!