03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

chapter of Revelation informs us that God and the Church of the redeemed will take up<br />

their dwellingplace on earth after heaven and earth have been renewed; how then can it<br />

be maintained that Christ and the saints will dwell there a thousand years before this<br />

renewal. How will sinners and saints in the flesh be able to stand in the presence of the<br />

glorified Christ, seeing that even Paul and John were completely overwhelmed <strong>by</strong> the<br />

vision of Him, Acts 26:12-14; Rev. 1:17? Beet truly says: “We cannot conceive mingled<br />

together on the same planet some who have yet to die and others who have passed<br />

through death and will die no more. Such confusion of the present age with the age to<br />

come is in the last degree unlikely.” 22 And Brown calls out: “What a mongrel state of<br />

things is this! What an abhorred mixture of things totally inconsistent with each<br />

other!” 23<br />

f. The only Scriptural basis for this theory is Rev. 20:1-6, after an Old Testament<br />

content has been poured into it. This is a very precarious basis for various reasons. (1)<br />

This passage occurs in a highly symbolical book and is admittedly very obscure, as may<br />

be inferred from the different interpretations of it. (2) The literal interpretation of this<br />

passage, as given <strong>by</strong> the Premillenarians, leads to a view that finds no support<br />

elsewhere in Scripture, but is even contradicted <strong>by</strong> the rest of the <strong>New</strong> Testament. This<br />

is a fatal objection. Sound exegesis requires that the obscure passages of Scripture be<br />

read in the light of the clearer ones, and not vice versa. (3) Even the literal interpretation<br />

of the Premillenarians is not consistently literal, for it makes the chain in verse 1 and<br />

consequently also the binding of verse 2 figurative, often conceives of the thousand<br />

years as a long but undefined period, and changes the souls of verse 4 into resurrection<br />

saints. (4) The passage, strictly speaking, does not say that the classes referred to (the<br />

martyr saints and those who did not worship the beast) were raised up from the dead,<br />

but simply that they lived and reigned with Christ. And this living and reigning with<br />

Christ is said to constitute the first resurrection. (5) There is absolutely no indication in<br />

these verses that Christ and His saints are seen ruling on the earth. In the light of such<br />

passages as Rev. 4:4; 6:9, it is far more likely that the scene is laid in heaven. (6) It also<br />

deserves notice that the passage makes no mention whatsoever of Palestine, of<br />

Jerusalem, of the temple, and of the Jews, the natural citizens of the millennial kingdom.<br />

There is not a single hint that these are in any way concerned with this reign of a<br />

thousand years. For a detailed interpretation of this passage from the Amillennial point<br />

of view we refer to Kuyper, Bavinck, De Moor, Dijk, Greydanus, Vos, and Hendriksen.<br />

22 The Last Things, p. 88.<br />

23 The Second Advent, p. 384.<br />

793

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!