03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

disappearing under the influence of a better exegesis of Gen. 6:2. A beneficent influence<br />

was ascribed to the unfallen angels, while the fallen angels were regarded as corrupting<br />

the hearts of men, as stimulating to heresy. and as engendering diseases and calamities.<br />

The polytheistic tendencies of many of the converts to Christianity fostered an<br />

inclination to worship the angels. Such worship was formally condemned <strong>by</strong> a council<br />

which convened at Laodicea in the fourth century.<br />

During the Middle Ages there were still a few who were inclined to assume that the<br />

angels have ethereal bodies, but the prevailing opinion was that they were incorporeal.<br />

The angelic appearances were explained <strong>by</strong> assuming that in such cases angels adopted<br />

temporal bodily forms for revelational purposes. Several points were in debate among<br />

the Scholastics. As to the time of the creation of the angels the prevailing opinion was<br />

that they were created at the same time as the material universe. While some held that<br />

the angels were created in the state of grace, the more common opinion was that they<br />

were created in a state of natural perfection only. There was little difference of opinion<br />

respecting the question, whether angels can be said to be in a place. The common<br />

answer to this question was affirmative, though it was pointed out that their presence in<br />

space is not circumscriptive but definitive, since only bodies can be in space<br />

circumscriptively. While all the Scholastics agreed that the knowledge of the angels is<br />

limited, the Thomists and Scotists differed considerably respecting the nature of this<br />

knowledge. It was admitted <strong>by</strong> all that the angels received infused knowledge at the<br />

time of their creation, but Thomas Aquinas denied, while Duns Scotus affirmed, that<br />

they could acquire new knowledge through their own intellectual activity. The former<br />

held that the knowledge of the angels is purely intuitive, but the latter asserted that it<br />

may also be discursive. The idea of guardian angels found considerable favor during<br />

the Middle Ages.<br />

The period of the Reformation brought nothing new respecting the doctrine of the<br />

angels. Both Luther and Calvin had a vivid conception of their ministry, and<br />

particularly of the presence and power of Satan. The latter stresses the fact that he is<br />

under divine control, and that, while he is sometimes the instrument of God, he can<br />

only work within prescribed limits. Protestant theologians generally regarded the<br />

angels as pure spiritual beings, though Zanchius and Grotius still speak of them as<br />

having ethereal bodies. As to the work of the good angels the general opinion was that<br />

it is their special task to minister to the heirs of salvation. There was no general<br />

agreement, however, respecting the existence of guardian angels. Some favored this<br />

view, others opposed it, and still others refused to commit themselves on this point. Our<br />

Belgic Confession says in Article XII, which deals with creation: “He also created the<br />

154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!