18.09.2013 Views

Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior - Soltanieh ...

Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior - Soltanieh ...

Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior - Soltanieh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONDUCT PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS<br />

Table 5.2 Example <strong>of</strong> a behavior observation scale for the job <strong>of</strong> a manager: the<br />

performance dimension is problem solving<br />

Performance dimension: problem solving<br />

Almost Never 1 2 3 4 5 Almost Always<br />

_____ Analyzes complex problems.<br />

_____ Persists even when the solution is not clear or obvious.<br />

_____ Develops new methods for solving problems.<br />

_____ Implements innovative solutions.<br />

_____ Takes responsibility for diffi culties in the group.<br />

_____ Addresses diffi culties in the group.<br />

_____ Seeks advice <strong>of</strong> team members and others when needed and appropriate.<br />

providing feedback to individuals that they can understand because the feedback is about<br />

observable job behaviors. Hence, individuals react favorably to these instruments (Tziner<br />

and Kopelman, 2002 ). Given the prevalence <strong>of</strong> rater errors, the bias in observation,<br />

recall, and the evaluation <strong>of</strong> performance, the importance <strong>of</strong> features like these cannot be<br />

overemphasized.<br />

One other approach that should be mentioned is the traditional results - based method<br />

<strong>of</strong> rating individuals. The emphasis here is on whether the individual achieves the objective<br />

output that is established at the onset <strong>of</strong> the rating period (e.g. total sales per month).<br />

Although results - based measures are objective indicators <strong>of</strong> an employee ’s performance,<br />

and are less susceptible to the rater biases noted above, they are not without their drawbacks.<br />

Individuals may fail to meet the objectives as a result <strong>of</strong> factors beyond their control<br />

(e.g. poor economy, organizational constraints). However, these constraints are not always<br />

apparent to all stakeholders, nor are they agreed upon. It can be demotivating to receive<br />

less favorable appraisals in these circumstances. This approach makes it difficult for a<br />

manager to provide developmental feedback because it is not always clear why the objective<br />

or target was not met and managers and employees may have different explanations.<br />

Although some firms still use the results - based approach in performance appraisal, it is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten combined with a behavioral component. Lincoln Electric has one <strong>of</strong> the most talked<br />

about piece rate systems where individuals are evaluated and paid on the basis <strong>of</strong> objective/<br />

quantifiable output (Hastings, 1999 ). However, this system also includes a behavioral<br />

component in which individuals are rated on the job dimensions <strong>of</strong> dependability, quality,<br />

ideas, and cooperation in addition to output. A more recent example <strong>of</strong> a results - oriented<br />

appraisal system can be found at Best Buy ’s corporate headquarters, where it implemented<br />

a Results Oriented Work Environment in 2003 (Conlin, 2006 ). In this system, there are no<br />

schedules and very few mandatory meetings. Individuals are free to work wherever they want,<br />

whenever they want, as long as they achieve the results they agree to. Best Buy indicates that<br />

productivity has increased and voluntary turnover has decreased (Conlin, 2006 ).<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!