Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior - Soltanieh ...

176 G ARY P. LATHAM
Latham , G. P. , and Brown , T. C. ( 2006 ). The effect of learning vs. outcome goals on self - effi cacy
and satisfaction in a MBA Program . Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55 , 606–623 .
Latham, G. P., and Budworth, M. (2006). The effect of training in verbal self-guidance on
the self-efficacy and performance of Native North Americans in the selection interview.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 516–523.
Latham, G. P., and Frayne , C. ( 1989 ). Self - management training for increasing job attendance:
A follow - up and a replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 , 411–416 .
Latham, G. P., and Kinne, S. B. (1974). Improving Job Performance through Training in
Goal Setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 187–191.
Latham , G. P. , and Locke , E. A. ( 1975 ). Increasing productivity with decreasing time limits:
A fi eld replication of Parkinson’s law. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 , 524–526 .
Latham , G. P. , and Locke, E. A. ( 1991 ). Self regulation through goal setting . Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50 , 212–247 .
Latham , G. P. , and Locke, E. A. ( 2007 ). New developments in and directions for goal setting
. European Psychologist, 12 , 290–300 .
Latham , G. P. , and Saari , L. M. ( 1979a ). The effects of holding goal difficulty constant on
assigned and participatively set goals. Academy of Management Journal, 22 , 163–168 .
Latham , G. P. , and Saari , L. M. ( 1979b ). The importance of supportive relationships in
goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64 , 151–156 .
Latham , G. P. , and Saari , L. M. ( 1982 ). The importance of union acceptance for productivity
improvement through goal setting. Personnel Psychology, 35 , 781–787 .
Latham , G. P. , and Seijts , G. H. ( 1999 ). The effects of proximal and distal goals on performance
on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 , 421–429 .
Latham , G. P. , and Steele , T. P. ( 1983 ). The motivational effects of participation versus
goal setting on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 26 , 406–417 .
Latham , G. P. , and Yukl , G. A. ( 1975 ). Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated
and uneducated wood workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 , 299–302 .
Latham , G. P., Erez , M., and Locke, E. A. ( 1988 ). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint
design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez – Latham dispute
regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 , 753–772 .
Latham , G. P., Locke , E. A. , and Fassina , N. E. ( 2002 ). The high performance cycle: Standing
the test of time. In S. Sonnentag (ed.), The Psychological Management of Individual Performance:
A Handbook in the Psychology of Management in Organizations (pp. 201–228 ). Chichester : Wiley .
Latham , G. P., Mitchell , T. R. , and Dossett , D. L. ( 1978 ). The importance of participative
goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 63 , 170–171 .
Latham , G. P., Seijts , H., and Crim , D. (2008). The effects of learning goal diffi culty level
and cognitive ability on strategies and performance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,
40, 220–229.
Latham , G. P., Winters , D. C. , and Locke, E. A. ( 1994 ). Cognitive and motivational effects
of participation: a mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15 , 49–63 .
Locke, E. A. , and Latham , G. P. ( 1990 ). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall .
Locke, E. A. , and Latham , G. P. ( 2002 ). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting
and task motivation: A 35 - year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57 , 705–717 .