18.09.2013 Views

Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior - Soltanieh ...

Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior - Soltanieh ...

Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior - Soltanieh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

624 M IRIAM E REZ<br />

High<br />

Power Distance<br />

Low<br />

Top-Down – Group Top-Down – Individual<br />

Assigned Group Goals Assigned Individuals Goals –<br />

Group Feedback Individual Feedback<br />

Face Saving – error Be successful – promotion<br />

prevention<br />

Team based bonus – high Individual based bonus – high<br />

differential differential<br />

Lateral – Group Lateral – Individual<br />

Participative Group Goal setting Empowering personal goal setting<br />

Team reflexivity – Feedback 360-degree personal feedback<br />

Face Saving/harmony – Error Risk taking/uniqueness –<br />

prevention promotion towards new<br />

opportunities and new records<br />

Team based bonus – low Individual based bonus – low<br />

differential differential<br />

Collectivism Individualism<br />

FIGURE 33.3 Fit interpersonal management practices with local cultures<br />

in Western cultures are more intrinsically motivated when they are involved in setting the<br />

goals rather than when goals are externally set for them. Empowerment is considered to<br />

be a strong motivational approach in Western cultures. This is not the case in India and<br />

the Far East. In these high power distance cultures, employees expect their boss to set<br />

goals for them and they are highly motivated to accomplish externally set goals. In fact,<br />

managers who empower their employees to set goals are considered to be weak and they<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten lose the respect <strong>of</strong> their subordinates.<br />

Employees in Asian countries, where there is high collectivism and high power distance,<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten more strongly motivated to avoid errors and failures than they are motivated to<br />

win and be the first one. This may be because <strong>of</strong> the fear <strong>of</strong> authority should they fail,<br />

and because <strong>of</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> failing the group to which a person belongs, as his/her personal<br />

failure is attributed to the entire group. Therefore, employees in the Far East are likely to<br />

set moderate rather than diffi cult goals, to reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> failure.<br />

The motivations to avoid failure and to save face have implications for what is deemed the<br />

acceptable form <strong>of</strong> feedback. Feedback is considered to be a strong motivational factor in<br />

Western cultures, in particular when it is provided at the individual level. Yet, in countries<br />

such as Japan, feedback takes a different form. Explicit individual feedback threatens the<br />

individual ’s status in the team. It violates the important value <strong>of</strong> face saving, causing a<br />

person to feel shame. For this reason, implicit and impersonal feedback, oriented to the<br />

collective rather than to the individual, is considered to be the norm. Consequently,<br />

Western managers operating in the Far East should recognize such cultural differences<br />

and adjust their feedback to their employees to the local culture.<br />

Reward allocation<br />

A key issue is how to allocate rewards in order to enhance motivation. If you are an<br />

American manager, you most likely implement the principle <strong>of</strong> equity. Indeed, in most

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!