Namibia PDNA 2009 - GFDRR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 7: Value of damage and losses caused by the 2009 floods disaster in Namibia Sector/ Sub-sector Damage (N$ million) Losses (N$ million) Damage (US$ million) Losses (US$ million) Infrastructure 279.7 32.2 34.3 4.9 Water Supply & Sanitation 47.9 28 5.9 3.4 Transport 223.2 2.9 27.4 0.4 Energy 8.6 1.3 1.1 0.2 Productive 405.1 584.4 49.7 71.7 Agriculture 38.6 120.9 4.7 14.8 Industry 143.5 162 17.6 19.9 Commerce 209.7 289.7 25.7 35.5 Tourism 13.3 11.8 1.6 1.4 Social 416.5 19.5 51.1 2.4 Housing 385.7 13.8 47.3 1.7 Health 0.7 5.7 0.1 0.7 Education 30.1 0 3.7 0.0 Cross-sectoral 10 0.9 1.2 0.1 Environment 10 0.9 1.2 0.1 Total 1,111.30 637.1 136.4 78.2 Source: Estimations by PDNA Team Of note is that most of the destroyed assets (72 per cent) fall within the domain of the private sector, including private individuals and enterprises, and that only a fraction (28 percent) of damage falls within the domain of the public sector. In terms of losses in economic flows, this proportion is even more pronounced: 94 percent of economic losses were sustained by the private sector, and only 6 percent in the public sector. This pattern of ownership of the effects of the floods is of special relevance, since it provides evidence of the proportion of efforts and investments that are to be made by the Government and by the private sectors to overcome the negative impact of the disaster. Figure 9: Ownership of Disaster Damage (Left) and Disaster Losses (Right) Among Public and Private Sectors 28% 5% Public Private 72% 95% Public Private Source: Estimates by PDNA Team The structure of damage among sectors of economic activity in the affected areas is also of special relevance since the social sectors sustained 37.5 percent, the productive sectors sustained 36.5 percent, and infrastructure sustained 25 percent of the total damages. The structure of losses, however, is concentrated heavily in the productive sectors (92 percent), while infrastructure and social sectors account for the remaining 8 percent. This evidences the socio-productive nature of the disaster, rather than the typical case of disaster effects concentrated on infrastructure. 9
Figure 10: Distribution of damage (left) and losses (right) among in sectors of economic activity 25% 1% 92% 3% 5% 0% Social Productive 36% 37% Infrastructure Environment Environment Infrastructure Productive Social Source: Estimations by PDNA Team When breaking down the effects of the floods by individual sectors of economic activity, the damages are concentrated heavily in sectors such as housing (N$385.5 million, or 35 percent of the total), transport (N$223.2 million, or 20 percent) trade (N$209.7 million, or 19 percent), and manufacturing (N$143.5 million, or 13 percent). However, when considering the impact of the floods on losses to the economy, the decline in production is considered. In this case, losses are concentrated – in order of decreasing magnitude – in the trade sector (N$499.4 million, or 45 percent of total losses), manufacturing (N$162 million, or 25 percent), and in agriculture (N$120.9 million, or 19 percent). The spatial or geographical distribution of damage and losses was by no means uniform. In fact, of the six affected Regions, Omusati sustained the greatest damages, followed by Oshana, and Oshikoto. Oshikoto sustained the highest losses, followed by Omusati and Caprivi (see Table 8). Figure 11: Sectoral distribution of damage and losses Environment Water and sanitation Electricity Transport Tourism Commerce Industry Agriculture Education Health Housing 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Damages Losses Source: Estimations by PDNA Team 10 Namibia POST-DISASTER NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Page 1 and 2: POST-DISASTER NEEDS ASSESSMENT FLOO
Page 3 and 4: Foreword In March of 2009, torrenti
Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents Foreword ii Ackno
Page 7 and 8: Table 51 Indication of losses incur
Page 9 and 10: List of Abbreviations AIDS Acquired
Page 11 and 12: Executive Summary In March 2009, fl
Page 13 and 14: The recommendations for recovery an
Page 15 and 16: Strengthened Community Awareness Co
Page 17 and 18: 1.1 The 2009 Floods Omusati Oshana
Page 19 and 20: In addition, the President called u
Page 21 and 22: prolonged dry spells and droughts),
Page 23: 2.1 Methodology In the aftermath of
Page 27 and 28: The average value of damage in the
Page 29 and 30: 3.1 Sector Impacts: Infrastructure
Page 31 and 32: Rail and Air Transport There was no
Page 33 and 34: 3.2 3.2.1 Sector Impacts: Productiv
Page 35 and 36: Needs/Timeline Table 16: Summary of
Page 37 and 38: worst, some in Oshikoto, Kavango an
Page 39 and 40: Private sector reconstruction using
Page 41 and 42: not have to provide food to learner
Page 43 and 44: Needs The needs of the environment
Page 45 and 46: 4.1 Macro-economic Impact This sect
Page 47 and 48: Impact on the balance of payment Th
Page 49 and 50: 4.2 Impact on Income and livelihood
Page 51 and 52: HIV/AIDS The floods caused consider
Page 53 and 54: 5.1 Introduction The most likely sc
Page 55 and 56: Box: 2: Early Recovery: Guiding pri
Page 57 and 58: Housing, shelter and settlements Th
Page 59 and 60: 5.4 Recommendations on when to move
Page 61 and 62: 6.1 Recovery and Reconstruction Str
Page 63 and 64: Figure 36: Long-term reconstruction
Page 65 and 66: 6.5 The way forward The medium and
Page 67 and 68: 7.1 Situation during the Disaster T
Page 69 and 70: of 2-6oC by end of the century, a l
Page 71 and 72: could involve flags, megaphones or
Page 73 and 74: 7.3 On-going interventions While th
Page 75 and 76:
Annex 1 Water Supply and Sanitation
Page 77 and 78:
access. It was observed that if the
Page 79 and 80:
water. Similarly, access roads from
Page 81 and 82:
Table 44: Roads proposed for improv
Page 83 and 84:
Annex 3 Energy Pre-disaster Situati
Page 85 and 86:
Table 50: Losses incurred due to 20
Page 87 and 88:
Annex 4 Agriculture, Livestock and
Page 89 and 90:
System (NEWFIS), reported concerns
Page 91 and 92:
and affect both urban and rural vul
Page 93 and 94:
In 1998, the Government launched a
Page 95 and 96:
Annex 5 Industry and Commerce Pre-d
Page 97 and 98:
In Namibia, small businesses can be
Page 99 and 100:
Needs In light of the vulnerability
Page 101 and 102:
Table 66: Total damages and lost re
Page 103 and 104:
Governance Issues Namibia is one of
Page 105 and 106:
constructed elevated roads increase
Page 107 and 108:
epresents 31 percent. In comparison
Page 109 and 110:
Table 73: Early and medium and long
Page 111 and 112:
and reproductive health. This was f
Page 113 and 114:
Provision of safe water was done by
Page 115 and 116:
Intensive capacity-building activit
Page 117 and 118:
The Table below indicates the numbe
Page 119 and 120:
Table 80: Budget for 2008/2009 and
Page 121 and 122:
The total damages and losses are su
Page 123 and 124:
displacement and often impact girls
Page 125 and 126:
Needs The education sector response
Page 127 and 128:
The major long-term environmental c
Page 129 and 130:
paltry in comparison to ongoing thr
Page 131 and 132:
Table 90: Environment sector needs
Page 133 and 134:
Annex 11 Food Security Pre-disaster
Page 135 and 136:
mahangu and maize meal must be mutu
Page 137 and 138:
Figure 42: Maize Meal Prices in Urb
Page 139 and 140:
The total amount of food commoditie
Page 141 and 142:
Food distributions • To strengthe
Page 143 and 144:
Annex 12 GIS Mapping Background One
Page 145 and 146:
spectrum (and roughly comparable to
Page 147 and 148:
Useful web links and References For
Page 149 and 150:
Activities Key Outputs Time Frame R
Page 151:
Activities Key Outputs Time Frame R
show all

Namibia PDNA 2009 - GFDRR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?