13.11.2013 Views

Namibia PDNA 2009 - GFDRR

Namibia PDNA 2009 - GFDRR

Namibia PDNA 2009 - GFDRR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.4<br />

3.4.1<br />

Cross-Cutting Issues<br />

Environment<br />

Due to low population and development pressure, the natural environment of <strong>Namibia</strong><br />

remains generally in good health. It has an important and well-recognized role in the<br />

economy, and the extensive protected areas system alone is estimated to contribute<br />

3-6 percent of GDP, mainly through tourism.<br />

In the areas impacted by the flooding, the floodplains of the northeast remain in a<br />

largely natural condition, although subject to some human modification, and their natural<br />

assets were therefore little affected by the flooding. The oshanas of the north-central<br />

region, however, have been extensively degraded by increasing human and livestock<br />

populations, and are highly vulnerable to further land degradation and soil erosion. Even<br />

in this area, however, the gradual nature of the flooding resulted in very little direct<br />

impact on natural resources, and the greater issue is the potential for exacerbated<br />

resource depletion due to the additional demand created by reconstruction activities.<br />

The environmental damages and losses enumerated here were therefore confined to<br />

(i) some modest impacts on protected areas infrastructure with consequent losses of<br />

gate revenues and exception wildlife management costs, and (ii) small additional waste<br />

disposal costs associated with the clean-up of limited amounts of debris created in the<br />

oshanas.<br />

Figure 30: Arial view of flooding<br />

Sub-sector/<br />

Component<br />

Table 27: Summary of damage and losses in the environment sector<br />

Damage<br />

(N$ million)<br />

Losses<br />

(N$ million)<br />

Damage<br />

(US$ million)<br />

Losses<br />

(US$ million)<br />

Oshikoto<br />

Etosha NP 3.0 0.27 0.4 0.03<br />

Oshana<br />

Waste management 0.0 0.50 0.0 0.06<br />

Kavango<br />

Mahangu WR 5.0 0.15 0.6 0.02<br />

Caprivi<br />

Mamili NP 2.0 0 0.2 0.00<br />

Buffalo feeding 0.0 0.12 0.0 0.01<br />

Total 10.0 1.04 1.2 0.13<br />

Source: Estimations by DaLA Team<br />

In terms of the impact on environmental resources, the flooding is probably beneficial on balance, and the greater threat to the<br />

stressed environment of the oshanas remains from drought and desertification. In the broader environmental narrative, the real issue<br />

is adaptation of the local populations to the ongoing environmental processes to which they are subject. This includes planning and<br />

impact assessment for floodplain development activities, and ensuring proper application of environmental engineering, particularly<br />

drainage standards. These issues are covered in more detail under the general discussion of river basin and flood management in the<br />

Disaster Risk Management section of the report, and in the sectors affected by sub-standard environmental engineering, particularly<br />

transport.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!