18.11.2013 Views

m - City of New Braunfels

m - City of New Braunfels

m - City of New Braunfels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

130<br />

EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 3, 2010<br />

PUBLIC HEARINGS<br />

Case PZ10-27: Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to <strong>City</strong> Council regarding the<br />

proposed rezoning <strong>of</strong> 47.97 acres located on the west side <strong>of</strong> Oak Run Parkway, approximately<br />

2,000 feet north <strong>of</strong> Loop 337, from "R-1A-8" Single Family District to "POD" Planned Development<br />

District with a Concept Plan. (Westpointe Residential)<br />

Ms. Mullins explained said this portion <strong>of</strong> the Westpointe development was zoned R-1A-8 with restrictions<br />

in 2007. Restrictions included masonry and height limits adjacent to Hunters Creek, and no street<br />

connection between the two subdivisions. She said the applicant was now requesting a Planned<br />

Development District (PDD) with R-1A-8 base zoning. She said the Concept Plan presented by the<br />

applicant showed a residential neighborhood <strong>of</strong> 136 lots, for a gross residential density <strong>of</strong> 3.06 units per<br />

acre, with meandering streets and over 9 acres <strong>of</strong> park/open space in addition to dedicating 10 acres <strong>of</strong><br />

parkland on Mission Hill to the <strong>City</strong>. She said that restrictions from the former zoning were incorporated in<br />

the development standards and all standards <strong>of</strong> the R-1A-8 base zoning would apply unless specifically<br />

modified by the PDD. Ms. Mullins then briefly outlined the departures from ordinance standards. She<br />

stated that 18 notices were sent to property owners within 200 ft. <strong>of</strong> the subject property; no responses<br />

were received in favor <strong>of</strong> the rezoning and two responses were received in opposition (#12, 15). She<br />

concluded by stating that staff recommended approval <strong>of</strong> the proposed POD with the following revisions<br />

to the development standards: 1) Restrict parking to one side <strong>of</strong> the street with a pavement section <strong>of</strong> 28<br />

feet; 2) Include a center line stripe; and 3) Amend the Concept Plan Summary Table to show 15' side<br />

setback along Westpointe Dr.<br />

Chair Casteel asked Ms. Mullins to explain the masonry requirement for homes adjacent to Hunter's<br />

Creek Subdivision. Ms. Mullins explained the restrictions were adopted in 2007 and noted that only a few<br />

homes on the proposed plan ·would have to abide by the masonry requirement and single story limitation<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the green space buffer between the two developments.<br />

Chair Casteel asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in favor <strong>of</strong> the rezoning.<br />

Steve Eckland with Bury & Partners spoke on behalf <strong>of</strong> the developer. He compared the proposed layout<br />

<strong>of</strong> the development with that previously approved and noted that the number <strong>of</strong> lots had decreased, the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> open space had increased and 2.4 acres <strong>of</strong> impervious cover had been removed. He said the<br />

developer was willing to increase pavement width to 30 ft. to allow parking on both sides <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />

Joey Guerra, 11202 Disco Drive, San Antonio, owner and developer, believed that the additional green<br />

space between the subdivisions should not limit the homes to single story. He noted that they were<br />

required to reduce the percentage <strong>of</strong> impervious cover in the residential development because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

additional water flowing towards the property from the extension <strong>of</strong> Oak Run Parkway.<br />

Discussion relating to masonry and height requirements followed . Drainage problems in the area were<br />

also discussed at length.<br />

Chair Casteel asked those opposed to the rezoning to address the Commission.<br />

Phil Miner, 443 Hunters Trophy, described the significant flooding problems in the neighborhood. He said<br />

he objected to the rezoning for safety and environmental concerns.<br />

Ron Reaves, 521 Hunters Creek, said he was an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the Hunters Creek Property Owners<br />

Association. He asked the Commission to incorporate the same wording regarding masonry requirements<br />

and height limitation in the new ordinance. He described his concerns with flooding problems in the area<br />

and asked the Commission not to recommend approval <strong>of</strong> the rezoning until all questions had been<br />

answered.<br />

ATTACHMENT 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!