m - City of New Braunfels
m - City of New Braunfels
m - City of New Braunfels
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
130<br />
EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 3, 2010<br />
PUBLIC HEARINGS<br />
Case PZ10-27: Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to <strong>City</strong> Council regarding the<br />
proposed rezoning <strong>of</strong> 47.97 acres located on the west side <strong>of</strong> Oak Run Parkway, approximately<br />
2,000 feet north <strong>of</strong> Loop 337, from "R-1A-8" Single Family District to "POD" Planned Development<br />
District with a Concept Plan. (Westpointe Residential)<br />
Ms. Mullins explained said this portion <strong>of</strong> the Westpointe development was zoned R-1A-8 with restrictions<br />
in 2007. Restrictions included masonry and height limits adjacent to Hunters Creek, and no street<br />
connection between the two subdivisions. She said the applicant was now requesting a Planned<br />
Development District (PDD) with R-1A-8 base zoning. She said the Concept Plan presented by the<br />
applicant showed a residential neighborhood <strong>of</strong> 136 lots, for a gross residential density <strong>of</strong> 3.06 units per<br />
acre, with meandering streets and over 9 acres <strong>of</strong> park/open space in addition to dedicating 10 acres <strong>of</strong><br />
parkland on Mission Hill to the <strong>City</strong>. She said that restrictions from the former zoning were incorporated in<br />
the development standards and all standards <strong>of</strong> the R-1A-8 base zoning would apply unless specifically<br />
modified by the PDD. Ms. Mullins then briefly outlined the departures from ordinance standards. She<br />
stated that 18 notices were sent to property owners within 200 ft. <strong>of</strong> the subject property; no responses<br />
were received in favor <strong>of</strong> the rezoning and two responses were received in opposition (#12, 15). She<br />
concluded by stating that staff recommended approval <strong>of</strong> the proposed POD with the following revisions<br />
to the development standards: 1) Restrict parking to one side <strong>of</strong> the street with a pavement section <strong>of</strong> 28<br />
feet; 2) Include a center line stripe; and 3) Amend the Concept Plan Summary Table to show 15' side<br />
setback along Westpointe Dr.<br />
Chair Casteel asked Ms. Mullins to explain the masonry requirement for homes adjacent to Hunter's<br />
Creek Subdivision. Ms. Mullins explained the restrictions were adopted in 2007 and noted that only a few<br />
homes on the proposed plan ·would have to abide by the masonry requirement and single story limitation<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the green space buffer between the two developments.<br />
Chair Casteel asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in favor <strong>of</strong> the rezoning.<br />
Steve Eckland with Bury & Partners spoke on behalf <strong>of</strong> the developer. He compared the proposed layout<br />
<strong>of</strong> the development with that previously approved and noted that the number <strong>of</strong> lots had decreased, the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> open space had increased and 2.4 acres <strong>of</strong> impervious cover had been removed. He said the<br />
developer was willing to increase pavement width to 30 ft. to allow parking on both sides <strong>of</strong> the road.<br />
Joey Guerra, 11202 Disco Drive, San Antonio, owner and developer, believed that the additional green<br />
space between the subdivisions should not limit the homes to single story. He noted that they were<br />
required to reduce the percentage <strong>of</strong> impervious cover in the residential development because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
additional water flowing towards the property from the extension <strong>of</strong> Oak Run Parkway.<br />
Discussion relating to masonry and height requirements followed . Drainage problems in the area were<br />
also discussed at length.<br />
Chair Casteel asked those opposed to the rezoning to address the Commission.<br />
Phil Miner, 443 Hunters Trophy, described the significant flooding problems in the neighborhood. He said<br />
he objected to the rezoning for safety and environmental concerns.<br />
Ron Reaves, 521 Hunters Creek, said he was an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the Hunters Creek Property Owners<br />
Association. He asked the Commission to incorporate the same wording regarding masonry requirements<br />
and height limitation in the new ordinance. He described his concerns with flooding problems in the area<br />
and asked the Commission not to recommend approval <strong>of</strong> the rezoning until all questions had been<br />
answered.<br />
ATTACHMENT 10