Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
REGULATION SCHOOL THEORY<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
intrude into work relations and inculcate a ‘university’-like ethos in pioneering<br />
areas such as <strong>the</strong> IT industry.<br />
Scott Lash (2002) locates such trends in <strong>the</strong> even wider context <strong>of</strong> a shift<br />
from a ‘logic <strong>of</strong> manufacture’ to a ‘logic <strong>of</strong> information’ that heightens unpredictability<br />
and introduces an imperative to live with <strong>the</strong> ‘disorganisation’ that<br />
accompanies an unstable economy revolving round knowledge-intensive innovation<br />
and a culture that is equally insecure. This amounts to us living in a<br />
‘disinformed information society’, one characterised by upheaval and ephemera,<br />
a lack <strong>of</strong> fixity in everything that we do, that information at once enables and<br />
undermines.<br />
In such chaotic circumstances work can take one <strong>of</strong> two forms: ei<strong>the</strong>r innovation<br />
can be devolved to <strong>the</strong> shop floor and operatives allowed a larger role in<br />
<strong>the</strong> process (in <strong>the</strong> manner <strong>of</strong> Hirschhorn), or it can bypass <strong>the</strong> shop floor altoge<strong>the</strong>r,<br />
with its functions taken over by ‘pr<strong>of</strong>essional-managerial workers’ (p. 122)<br />
such as found already in <strong>the</strong> high-tech and advanced producer and consumer<br />
services. Lash envisages radical alternative societies emerging in this milieu.<br />
There may be ‘dead zones’ <strong>of</strong> deindustrialisation that fail to adapt to <strong>the</strong> information<br />
economy and come to be marked by high unemployment while hanging<br />
on to traditional cultures that are ‘tame zones’ in so far as <strong>the</strong>y remain reasonably<br />
orderly, traditional in outlook with some common ways <strong>of</strong> life. On an<br />
opposite pole Lash perceives ‘live zones’ that thrive economically in knowledgeintensive<br />
and innovative work practices, yet which also subscribe to established<br />
culturally ‘tame zones’ (for example, <strong>the</strong> conservative habitus <strong>of</strong> lawyers and<br />
accountants commuting from <strong>the</strong> shires to <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> London). Yet Lash can also<br />
see ‘live zones’ that are commercially buoyant, being engaged in informational<br />
activities such as fashion, music and media, yet which adopt a radical cultural<br />
outlook, <strong>the</strong>reby inhabiting a ‘wild zone’ <strong>of</strong> innovative and challenging lifestyles<br />
(e.g. as found in parts <strong>of</strong> metropolitan London such as Camden and Islington).<br />
Against this, one might also identify areas <strong>of</strong> disintegrated and combative culture<br />
in a ‘wild zone’ that is economically unsuccessful, perhaps where low-paid and<br />
insecure jobs are accompanied by a collapse <strong>of</strong> common values and behaviours.<br />
In this emerging world, whatever <strong>the</strong> cultural forms that emerge, <strong>the</strong>re can be<br />
little doubt that <strong>the</strong> best prospects are found in <strong>the</strong> highly skilled information<br />
occupations that manifest ‘flexible specialisation’.<br />
Web relations<br />
1<br />
We may recall Robert Reich’s (1991) work here because its suggestion that<br />
‘symbolic analysts’ have become <strong>the</strong> key drivers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy and organisers<br />
<strong>of</strong> innovation readily connects with concepts <strong>of</strong> flexible specialisation. Reich suggests<br />
that ‘symbolic analysts’ – those who do <strong>the</strong> thinking, analysing and planning<br />
in <strong>the</strong> information age – rely on and develop ways <strong>of</strong> working which are best<br />
understood, not as positions within a particular corporate hierarchy, but ra<strong>the</strong>r as<br />
situated amid ‘global webs’. This idea has been endorsed by o<strong>the</strong>r influential social<br />
scientists, not least Manuel Castells, whom I cover in <strong>the</strong> following chapter.<br />
93