Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REGULATION SCHOOL THEORY<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
cognate forms <strong>of</strong> display and persuasion. In <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom, lagging some<br />
way behind <strong>the</strong> United States, ordinary people gained access to hi<strong>the</strong>rto scarce<br />
and even unimagined consumer goods – from toiletries and personal hygiene<br />
products, stylish and fashionable clothing, vacuum cleaners, fitted carpets, refrigerators,<br />
radios and televisions, to motor cars – in <strong>the</strong> years following on from<br />
1945. Thus by 1970 nine out <strong>of</strong> ten homes had a television, seven out <strong>of</strong> ten a<br />
fridge, and over six out <strong>of</strong> ten a washing machine, while car ownership rose from<br />
2.3 million in 1950 to 11.8 million in 1970, with over half <strong>the</strong> nation’s households<br />
in possession <strong>of</strong> a car (Central Statistical Office, 1983, Table 15.4).<br />
Most important, mass consumption relied on working-class people gaining<br />
access to what was <strong>of</strong>fered since it was <strong>the</strong>y, being <strong>the</strong> overwhelming majority,<br />
who constituted <strong>the</strong> biggest market for goods. As <strong>the</strong>y achieved entry, so did <strong>the</strong>y<br />
verify <strong>the</strong> slogan <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n Prime Minister Harold Macmillan that people ‘had<br />
never had it so good’. Indeed <strong>the</strong>y had not since consumer goods had simply<br />
been unavailable at affordable prices for <strong>the</strong> mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population (major exceptions<br />
<strong>of</strong> course were ‘beer and baccy’).<br />
More than this, however, mass consumption became an axis <strong>of</strong> continuous and<br />
stable mass production. That is, during this epoch it became clear that steady and<br />
sustained mass consumption <strong>of</strong> goods was a requisite <strong>of</strong> an expanding production<br />
base which in turn ensured full employment. During <strong>the</strong> Fordist era <strong>the</strong><br />
health <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy was increasingly determined by <strong>the</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> consumer<br />
purchases (and by extension borrowing and credit terms), notably in automobiles<br />
and white goods, but extending much fur<strong>the</strong>r into o<strong>the</strong>r less prominent areas. It<br />
became, bluntly, a virtue to consume.<br />
The crucial point is that <strong>the</strong>re was achieved some calibration, some mutual<br />
balance, between mass consumption and mass production. This supplied what<br />
one might think <strong>of</strong> as a virtuous circuit by which continued growth <strong>of</strong> consumption<br />
supported full employment and jobs for all boosted consumer expansion.<br />
To ensure that this continued, a whole edifice <strong>of</strong> marketing and design techniques<br />
was developed – annual model changes in cars, a burgeoning advertising<br />
industry, new layouts <strong>of</strong> shops, trade-in deals, easy terms for purchase – but most<br />
important was <strong>the</strong> assurance <strong>of</strong> full employment and continuous real increases<br />
in income. So long as consumer demand was strong (and <strong>the</strong> state intervened<br />
frequently to ensure that it was), <strong>the</strong>n could <strong>the</strong> economy remain vibrant.<br />
Nation state and national oligopolies<br />
1<br />
Throughout this period <strong>the</strong> nation state was <strong>the</strong> locus <strong>of</strong> economic activity, and<br />
within this territory sectors were typically dominated by a cluster <strong>of</strong> national<br />
oligopolies. That is, surveying <strong>the</strong> industrial scene, one would characteristically<br />
identify three or four dominant companies in any one area, be it electronics,<br />
clothing, retailing or engineering. In line with this, in 1963 <strong>the</strong> leading five<br />
businesses in British manufacture accounted for almost 60 per cent <strong>of</strong> all sales<br />
in any trade area (Westergaard and Resler, 1975, p. 152). More generally, <strong>the</strong> top<br />
one hundred companies achieved one-third <strong>of</strong> all Britain’s manufacturing output<br />
67