Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER NINE<br />
<strong>Information</strong> and postmodernity<br />
The subject <strong>of</strong> this chapter is at once thrillingly bold and disturbingly vague. It<br />
is bold in that <strong>the</strong> prefix ‘post’ evokes <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> a decisive break with <strong>the</strong> past<br />
and <strong>the</strong> arrival <strong>of</strong> a new age. This notion is both appealing and interesting, not<br />
least because announcements <strong>of</strong> postmodernism and postmodernity accord with<br />
<strong>the</strong> views <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs who argue we are entering a novel information society.<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> subject is also disconcertingly vague, postmodernity/ism being<br />
vexingly hard to define with clarity. The terms can appear to be less <strong>of</strong> a definition<br />
than a series <strong>of</strong> descriptions and impressionistic suggestions (with repeated<br />
pronouncements on ‘difference’, ‘discourses’, ‘irony’ and <strong>the</strong> like). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />
postmodernism/ity seems at once to be everywhere (in architecture, in academic<br />
disciplines, in attitudes to <strong>the</strong> self) and, because <strong>the</strong> words are so imprecisely<br />
used, impossible to pin down.<br />
In a book such as this we need to explore this audacious yet vexing idea <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> postmodern, if only because it highlights <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> information in <strong>the</strong> ‘post’<br />
world in two notable ways. First, postmodern thinkers place emphasis on information<br />
(and communication) in characterising <strong>the</strong> new epoch. Second, leading<br />
‘post’ writers such as Jean Baudrillard and Roland Bar<strong>the</strong>s focus on information<br />
in ways that are intriguingly different from o<strong>the</strong>r information-society authors.<br />
They centre information nei<strong>the</strong>r in economic terms, nor from <strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong><br />
occupational shifts, nor from a concern with <strong>the</strong> flows <strong>of</strong> information across time<br />
and space. Ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y stress information’s significance in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spread<br />
<strong>of</strong> symbols and signs. This concern is for <strong>the</strong> explosive growth and pervasive<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> all forms <strong>of</strong> media, from video to cable, from advertising to fashion,<br />
to interest in body shapes, tattoos and graffiti. As such it draws attention to<br />
palpable features and particular qualities <strong>of</strong> life today, where we are surrounded<br />
by, even submerged in, a sea <strong>of</strong> signs and symbols. The ‘post’ concern for such<br />
matters is consonant with a great deal <strong>of</strong> information-society thinking and, as<br />
such, merits fur<strong>the</strong>r examination.<br />
Accordingly, what I want to discuss in this chapter is <strong>the</strong> relations between<br />
information and postmodernism. To this end I shall focus on <strong>the</strong> likes <strong>of</strong> Jean<br />
Baudrillard, Jean-François Lyotard and Mark Poster, who pay particular attention<br />
to <strong>the</strong> informational aspects <strong>of</strong> postmodernism. Preliminary to this, however,<br />
I shall attempt to define postmodernism in reasonably straightforward terms –<br />
no easy task in itself, since, as we shall see, it is hard to identify <strong>the</strong> essence <strong>of</strong><br />
228