28.12.2013 Views

Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome

Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome

Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INFORMATION AND THE MARKET<br />

potato’ lifestyles. Moreover, as <strong>the</strong>se and o<strong>the</strong>r information technologies fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

penetrate <strong>the</strong> home, so, too, does <strong>the</strong>ir programming bear <strong>the</strong> imprint <strong>of</strong> those<br />

who would use it to stimulate consumption fur<strong>the</strong>r. Advertisers and sponsors<br />

especially have created more, and more intensive, ways <strong>of</strong> getting across <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

messages to audiences: one thinks here <strong>of</strong> more careful targeting <strong>of</strong> images that<br />

can accompany subscription television, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> advertorials, <strong>of</strong> judicious<br />

product placement amidst <strong>the</strong> television serial and movie.<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong> programming itself encourages a consumerist lifestyle. Thus <strong>the</strong><br />

symbols <strong>of</strong> success, beauty, fashion, popularity, approval and pleasure that are<br />

displayed in everyday television are presented to <strong>the</strong> public which in response<br />

yearns for <strong>the</strong>m and seeks for <strong>the</strong>m on <strong>the</strong> market (Ewen, 1976, 1988; Ewen and<br />

Ewen, 1982). The cult <strong>of</strong> ‘celebrity’ (Rojek, 2001) exacerbates <strong>the</strong>se tendencies.<br />

These are, <strong>of</strong> course, arguments routinely presented in condemnations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

‘means <strong>of</strong> persuasion’: <strong>the</strong> populace are brainwashed into chasing after ‘false<br />

needs’ that are manufactured to aid in capitalism’s perpetuation ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

in response to <strong>the</strong> wishes <strong>of</strong> ordinary people. The third argument, however, is<br />

less frequently made. This suggests that ICT is exacerbating <strong>the</strong> tendency for<br />

<strong>the</strong> marketplace to replace self and communal organisation. Where once, for<br />

instance, people grew much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own food in <strong>the</strong> garden, or perhaps made<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own clo<strong>the</strong>s, nowadays virtually all <strong>of</strong> our requirements are met at <strong>the</strong><br />

supermarket or through <strong>the</strong> chain store (Seabrook, 1982b). Similarly, it is<br />

suggested that television and TV-type technologies take away <strong>the</strong> responsibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> arranging one’s own pleasures, replacing it with a new dependency on a<br />

machine which presents, in <strong>the</strong> main, diverting entertainment at which one<br />

gawks.<br />

Fourth, new technologies allow greater surveillance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wider public by<br />

corporations which are <strong>the</strong>n in a better position to address messages <strong>of</strong> persuasion<br />

towards <strong>the</strong>m. Years ago Dallas Smy<strong>the</strong> (1981) coined <strong>the</strong> term ‘audience<br />

commodity’ to draw attention to <strong>the</strong> way in which an important function <strong>of</strong> television<br />

was to deliver audiences to advertisers. The acid test for success was to<br />

be found not in <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programming, but in <strong>the</strong> numbers watching<br />

who could be sold to <strong>the</strong> advertiser. This continues today – and with a vengeance.<br />

For instance, free ‘newspapers’, delivered to every house in a given area, are not<br />

really intended to be a vehicle for informing householders <strong>of</strong> local news and<br />

events (sceptics might examine <strong>the</strong> free ‘newspapers’ in <strong>the</strong>ir own town to test<br />

this assertion); <strong>the</strong>ir central concern is to be in a position to claim to deliver to<br />

<strong>the</strong> advertiser every house in a given neighbourhood. This is, <strong>of</strong> course, a pretty<br />

crude form <strong>of</strong> surveillance (though a good deal more precise than broadcast television<br />

or radio). None<strong>the</strong>less, much more sophisticated forms come from <strong>the</strong><br />

selling <strong>of</strong> databases such as are held electronically by pr<strong>of</strong>essional associations,<br />

clubs and sales records. Again, new technologies enable <strong>the</strong> ready development<br />

<strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> customers and potential customers to be created by crossreferencing<br />

<strong>of</strong> such sources, to be followed by targeted persuasion. Here<br />

subscription television has great possibilities since it will be able to segment<br />

viewers by channel, programme preferences and even by volume and regularity<br />

<strong>of</strong> watching. Kevin Wilson (1988) coined <strong>the</strong> term ‘cybernetic marketing’ (p. 43)<br />

154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!