Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INFORMATION AND THE MARKET<br />
potato’ lifestyles. Moreover, as <strong>the</strong>se and o<strong>the</strong>r information technologies fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
penetrate <strong>the</strong> home, so, too, does <strong>the</strong>ir programming bear <strong>the</strong> imprint <strong>of</strong> those<br />
who would use it to stimulate consumption fur<strong>the</strong>r. Advertisers and sponsors<br />
especially have created more, and more intensive, ways <strong>of</strong> getting across <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
messages to audiences: one thinks here <strong>of</strong> more careful targeting <strong>of</strong> images that<br />
can accompany subscription television, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> advertorials, <strong>of</strong> judicious<br />
product placement amidst <strong>the</strong> television serial and movie.<br />
Second, <strong>the</strong> programming itself encourages a consumerist lifestyle. Thus <strong>the</strong><br />
symbols <strong>of</strong> success, beauty, fashion, popularity, approval and pleasure that are<br />
displayed in everyday television are presented to <strong>the</strong> public which in response<br />
yearns for <strong>the</strong>m and seeks for <strong>the</strong>m on <strong>the</strong> market (Ewen, 1976, 1988; Ewen and<br />
Ewen, 1982). The cult <strong>of</strong> ‘celebrity’ (Rojek, 2001) exacerbates <strong>the</strong>se tendencies.<br />
These are, <strong>of</strong> course, arguments routinely presented in condemnations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
‘means <strong>of</strong> persuasion’: <strong>the</strong> populace are brainwashed into chasing after ‘false<br />
needs’ that are manufactured to aid in capitalism’s perpetuation ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
in response to <strong>the</strong> wishes <strong>of</strong> ordinary people. The third argument, however, is<br />
less frequently made. This suggests that ICT is exacerbating <strong>the</strong> tendency for<br />
<strong>the</strong> marketplace to replace self and communal organisation. Where once, for<br />
instance, people grew much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own food in <strong>the</strong> garden, or perhaps made<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir own clo<strong>the</strong>s, nowadays virtually all <strong>of</strong> our requirements are met at <strong>the</strong><br />
supermarket or through <strong>the</strong> chain store (Seabrook, 1982b). Similarly, it is<br />
suggested that television and TV-type technologies take away <strong>the</strong> responsibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> arranging one’s own pleasures, replacing it with a new dependency on a<br />
machine which presents, in <strong>the</strong> main, diverting entertainment at which one<br />
gawks.<br />
Fourth, new technologies allow greater surveillance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wider public by<br />
corporations which are <strong>the</strong>n in a better position to address messages <strong>of</strong> persuasion<br />
towards <strong>the</strong>m. Years ago Dallas Smy<strong>the</strong> (1981) coined <strong>the</strong> term ‘audience<br />
commodity’ to draw attention to <strong>the</strong> way in which an important function <strong>of</strong> television<br />
was to deliver audiences to advertisers. The acid test for success was to<br />
be found not in <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programming, but in <strong>the</strong> numbers watching<br />
who could be sold to <strong>the</strong> advertiser. This continues today – and with a vengeance.<br />
For instance, free ‘newspapers’, delivered to every house in a given area, are not<br />
really intended to be a vehicle for informing householders <strong>of</strong> local news and<br />
events (sceptics might examine <strong>the</strong> free ‘newspapers’ in <strong>the</strong>ir own town to test<br />
this assertion); <strong>the</strong>ir central concern is to be in a position to claim to deliver to<br />
<strong>the</strong> advertiser every house in a given neighbourhood. This is, <strong>of</strong> course, a pretty<br />
crude form <strong>of</strong> surveillance (though a good deal more precise than broadcast television<br />
or radio). None<strong>the</strong>less, much more sophisticated forms come from <strong>the</strong><br />
selling <strong>of</strong> databases such as are held electronically by pr<strong>of</strong>essional associations,<br />
clubs and sales records. Again, new technologies enable <strong>the</strong> ready development<br />
<strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> customers and potential customers to be created by crossreferencing<br />
<strong>of</strong> such sources, to be followed by targeted persuasion. Here<br />
subscription television has great possibilities since it will be able to segment<br />
viewers by channel, programme preferences and even by volume and regularity<br />
<strong>of</strong> watching. Kevin Wilson (1988) coined <strong>the</strong> term ‘cybernetic marketing’ (p. 43)<br />
154