Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NETWORK SOCIETY<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
than <strong>the</strong> powers in <strong>the</strong> network’ (Castells, 1996, p. 193), a gnomic phrase that<br />
translates into saying that ICTs have reduced <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> global corporations<br />
and dramatically empowered those people and organisations who are<br />
entrepreneurial and effective in terms <strong>of</strong> networking. These people may actually<br />
be employed inside corporations, yet <strong>the</strong> new technologies have brought about<br />
<strong>the</strong> devolution <strong>of</strong> power from <strong>the</strong>ir employers to <strong>the</strong> network players.<br />
Castells (1996) goes on to extol what he calls <strong>the</strong> ‘spirit <strong>of</strong> informationalism’<br />
(p. 195). Here he borrows from Max Weber’s famous argument that <strong>the</strong>re was in<br />
Calvinist <strong>the</strong>ology an ‘elective affinity’ with <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> capitalism – <strong>the</strong><br />
‘Protestant ethic’ gelled with <strong>the</strong> ‘spirit <strong>of</strong> capitalism’ – to suggest a comparable<br />
element in operation today. Capitalism is still around, but ‘in new, pr<strong>of</strong>oundly<br />
modified forms’ (p. 198), at <strong>the</strong> core <strong>of</strong> which is this ‘spirit <strong>of</strong> informationalism’.<br />
Castells’s depiction <strong>of</strong> this ‘spirit <strong>of</strong> informationalism’ evokes an image <strong>of</strong> those<br />
participants in ‘cyberspace’ who are at ease with information exchanges, are<br />
well connected, and are so effectively networked that <strong>the</strong>y may seize <strong>the</strong> day.<br />
He appears awed by <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> network decisions to radically transform<br />
lives and events across <strong>the</strong> world in waves <strong>of</strong> ‘creative destruction’ (to use<br />
Schumpeter’s terms). It must follow, he asserts, that those who make such decisions<br />
are a new type <strong>of</strong> person, answerable not even to <strong>the</strong>ir employers, and<br />
always open to those with <strong>the</strong> talent to network. It is not surprising, <strong>the</strong>n, that<br />
Castells ends in describing this new state <strong>of</strong> affairs as being where ‘Schumpeter<br />
meets Weber in <strong>the</strong> cyberspace <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> network enterprise’ (p. 199), names which<br />
conjure a heady mix <strong>of</strong> tumultuous change, creativity and personal drive.<br />
Castells’s co-author, Pekka Himanen (2001), has extended this <strong>the</strong>sis to suggest<br />
that a ‘hacker ethic’ is evident today, being a combination <strong>of</strong> adventure and<br />
lawlessness in which <strong>the</strong> motivated work for <strong>the</strong> hell <strong>of</strong> it.<br />
Castells also pays considerable attention to changes in work practices and<br />
employment patterns. The conclusion <strong>of</strong> a lengthy definitional and statistical tour<br />
is that, in <strong>the</strong> view <strong>of</strong> Castells, information work has massively increased<br />
throughout society, that in <strong>the</strong> round it is more satisfying than <strong>the</strong> labour that<br />
was available in <strong>the</strong> past, that it is much more individuated than previously, and<br />
that <strong>the</strong> changed circumstances <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘network society’ mean that people must<br />
get used to being ‘flexible’ in what <strong>the</strong>y do and in what <strong>the</strong>y expect to be doing<br />
in <strong>the</strong> future if <strong>the</strong>y are to survive amid <strong>the</strong> ‘systemic volatility’ <strong>of</strong> informational<br />
capitalism.<br />
Cultural consequences <strong>of</strong> informational capitalism<br />
1<br />
Midway through, The Rise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Network <strong>Society</strong> shifts gear to reflect on <strong>the</strong><br />
cultural consequences <strong>of</strong> technological change. Castells has little truck with<br />
worries about <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> network, and fears about things such as computer<br />
pornography and bulletin boards for neo-fascists do not detain him. Castells<br />
detects a deeper consequence <strong>of</strong> ICTs, in a way that revives <strong>the</strong> legacy <strong>of</strong><br />
Marshall McLuhan, to whom Castells (1996) pays ‘homage’ (p. 329) for his insight<br />
that television announced <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> print (The Gutenberg Galaxy, 1962) and its<br />
105