Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Theories of the Information Society, Third Edition - Cryptome
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REGULATION SCHOOL THEORY<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
would draw attention to phenomena discussed in previous chapters, namely <strong>the</strong><br />
construction <strong>of</strong> a symbolic environment that reaches right around <strong>the</strong> globe and is<br />
organised, in very large part, by media TNCs.<br />
This has many important social and cultural consequences, but here I would<br />
emphasise only <strong>the</strong> bringing into being <strong>of</strong> an information domain which provides<br />
people with common images. For instance, movies originating in <strong>the</strong> United<br />
States achieve far and away <strong>the</strong> largest audiences wherever <strong>the</strong>y are shown<br />
across <strong>the</strong> globe. The top twenty movies worldwide <strong>of</strong> all time are all American<br />
products, ranging from Titanic (1997), The Lord <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rings: The Return <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> King<br />
(2003), Harry Potter and <strong>the</strong> Sorcerer’s Stone (2001), Star Wars 1 (1999) and Jurassic<br />
Park (1993) at <strong>the</strong> top, through Forrest Gump (1994) and Men in Black (1997) at<br />
mid-point, to Aladdin (1992) and Indiana Jones and <strong>the</strong> Last Crusade (1989). None<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se grossed less than $500 million, and Titanic took almost $2 billion. These<br />
movies were box-<strong>of</strong>fice leaders in Germany, Britain, Italy, France, Spain, Australia<br />
and <strong>the</strong> United States – indeed, pretty well everywhere where <strong>the</strong>re were<br />
cinemas. This situation provides audiences, widely diverse in <strong>the</strong>ir responses and<br />
dispositions though <strong>the</strong>y be, with a mutual symbolic sphere – and much <strong>the</strong> same<br />
could be said about today’s television shows, news agencies or, indeed, fashion<br />
industries. I would not wish to over-exaggerate this phenomenon, and for sure<br />
nationally centred media remain very important (Tunstall, 2006), but still it is true<br />
that globalisation is bringing into being shared symbolic spaces.<br />
However much one might want to qualify statements about just what consequences<br />
<strong>the</strong>re might be when it comes down to particular people and particular<br />
places, this globalisation <strong>of</strong> communications has a significant part to play in <strong>the</strong><br />
functioning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> global economic system. It cannot be said unequivocally that<br />
American television soaps dispose viewers towards <strong>the</strong> lifestyles portrayed,<br />
that <strong>the</strong> advertisements carried successfully persuade, that <strong>the</strong> designs displayed<br />
in <strong>the</strong> movies stimulate yearnings among audiences, or that <strong>the</strong> rock music<br />
emanating from Los Angeles and London encourages <strong>the</strong> world’s youth to seek<br />
after <strong>the</strong> styles <strong>of</strong> clothing <strong>of</strong> and foods eaten by its performers. Moreover, it is<br />
unarguable that <strong>the</strong>se global images <strong>of</strong>ten incorporate several elements <strong>of</strong><br />
different cultures so <strong>the</strong>y are not unidirectional in <strong>the</strong>ir orientation. In this respect<br />
Ulf Hannerz’s (1996) description <strong>of</strong> ‘Nigerian Kung Fu’ is apposite. But what<br />
surely cannot be dismissed is <strong>the</strong> view that it is hard to imagine large parts <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> world’s economic forces continuing without <strong>the</strong> underpinning <strong>of</strong> this symbolic<br />
milieu. It may not be sufficient in itself to persuade, but it is necessary to most<br />
commercial endeavour. To this degree one may conclude that <strong>the</strong> globalisation<br />
<strong>of</strong> communications plays a supportive, if at times tensive and even contradictory,<br />
role in <strong>the</strong> global market system <strong>of</strong> which it is itself a major manifestation. It is<br />
hard to conclude anything else given <strong>the</strong> centrality to contemporary marketing<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘branding’, <strong>the</strong> association <strong>of</strong> products and even corporations with imagery<br />
which is propagated through <strong>the</strong> media industries. Consider in this light <strong>the</strong><br />
centrality <strong>of</strong> symbols to Nike, to Calvin Klein or to <strong>the</strong> Virgin label. These brands<br />
may on occasion be damaged or subverted by aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> global media, but<br />
it is indisputable that without it <strong>the</strong>y would not prosper at all.<br />
73