30.12.2013 Views

Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA

Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA

Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY<br />

• allow ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> system or <strong>the</strong> student to ask open-ended questions and <strong>in</strong>itiate<br />

<strong>in</strong>structional, “mixed-<strong>in</strong>itiative” dialogue as needed or desired;<br />

• generate <strong>in</strong>structional material and <strong>in</strong>teractions on demand <strong>in</strong>stead of<br />

requir<strong>in</strong>g developers to foresee and store all <strong>the</strong> materials and <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />

needed to meet all possible eventualities.<br />

Mixed-<strong>in</strong>itiative dialogue requires a language for <strong>in</strong>formation retrieval,<br />

tools to assist decisionmak<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong>struction that is shared by both <strong>the</strong> system<br />

and <strong>the</strong> student/user. The system must have <strong>the</strong> capability (referred to as<br />

“generative capability”) to devise, on demand, <strong>in</strong>teractions with students that<br />

do not rely on predicted and prestored formats. This capability <strong>in</strong>volves more<br />

than generat<strong>in</strong>g problems tailored to each student’s needs. It must also provide<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions and presentations that simulate one-on-one tutorial <strong>in</strong>struction,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g coach<strong>in</strong>g, h<strong>in</strong>ts, and critiques of completed solutions.<br />

Cost conta<strong>in</strong>ment is one motivation for want<strong>in</strong>g to generate responses to all<br />

possible student states and actions <strong>in</strong>stead of attempt<strong>in</strong>g to anticipate and store<br />

<strong>the</strong>m. Ano<strong>the</strong>r arises from basic research on human learn<strong>in</strong>g, memory, perception,<br />

and cognition. As documented by Neisser among o<strong>the</strong>rs, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

1960s and 1970s, <strong>the</strong> emphasis <strong>in</strong> basic research on human behavior and on<br />

<strong>the</strong> way <strong>in</strong> which it is understood shifted from <strong>the</strong> strict logical positivism of<br />

behavioral psychology, which focused on directly observable actions, to consideration<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal, cognitive processes that were needed to expla<strong>in</strong><br />

empirically observed behavioral phenomena and are assumed to mediate and<br />

enable human learn<strong>in</strong>g. 35<br />

The hallmark of this approach is <strong>the</strong> view that see<strong>in</strong>g, hear<strong>in</strong>g, and remember<strong>in</strong>g<br />

are all acts of construction, mak<strong>in</strong>g more or less use of <strong>the</strong> limited<br />

stimulus <strong>in</strong>formation provided by our perceptual capabilities. Constructivist<br />

approaches are <strong>the</strong> subject of much current and relevant discussion <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>structional<br />

research circles, but <strong>the</strong>y are firmly grounded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> foundations of scientific<br />

psychology. 36 For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong> 1890, William James stated his General<br />

Law of Perception: “Whilst part of what we perceive comes through our<br />

senses from <strong>the</strong> object before us, ano<strong>the</strong>r part (and it may be <strong>the</strong> larger part)<br />

always comes out of our m<strong>in</strong>d.” 37<br />

In this sense, <strong>the</strong> generative capability sought by <strong>in</strong>telligent <strong>in</strong>structional<br />

systems is not merely someth<strong>in</strong>g nice to have. It is essential if we are to<br />

34<br />

J. R. Carbonell, “AI <strong>in</strong> CAI: An Artificial <strong>Intelligence</strong> Approach to Computer-Assisted Instruction”;<br />

J. D. Fletcher & M. R. Rockway.<br />

35<br />

U. Neisser, Cognitive Psychology.<br />

36<br />

For example, T. M. Duffy, and D. H. Jonassen, Constructivism and <strong>the</strong> Technology of Instruction;<br />

S. Tobias and L. T. Frase, “Educational psychology and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.”<br />

37<br />

William James, Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of Psychology: Volume I.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!