Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA
Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA
Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER FOUR<br />
Inputs, Processes, and Outputs of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Intelligence</strong> Cycle<br />
Inputs Processes Outputs<br />
Policymaker and o<strong>the</strong>r Direction Data collection<br />
stakeholder questions,<br />
requirements<br />
requirements<br />
Data collection Plann<strong>in</strong>g Task assignment,<br />
requirements, assessment<br />
potential data sources,<br />
of available resources and<br />
focus of analysis<br />
capabilities<br />
Open-source data: foreign Collection Potentially relevant data<br />
broadcasts, newspapers,<br />
periodicals, books;<br />
Classified data: case<br />
officer, diplomatic, and<br />
attaché reports,<br />
electronics, satellite<br />
photos<br />
Potentially relevant data<br />
Usable data<br />
Process<strong>in</strong>g: Reduction<br />
of data <strong>in</strong> a variety of<br />
formats to consistent<br />
pieces of usable data<br />
Analysis: Integration,<br />
evaluation, assessment<br />
of reliability, validity,<br />
and relevance of data<br />
Production: Peer<br />
review, supervisory<br />
review<br />
Usable Data<br />
F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
<strong>Analytic</strong> review<br />
Written briefs, studies,<br />
long range assessments,<br />
short range assessments,<br />
oral briefs, national<br />
<strong>in</strong>telligence estimates<br />
Written briefs, studies, Dissem<strong>in</strong>ation Appropriate product to<br />
long-range assessments,<br />
address customer’s need<br />
short-range assessments,<br />
oral briefs, national<br />
<strong>in</strong>telligence estimates<br />
The table above depicts a more detailed <strong>in</strong>put, process, and output analysis<br />
and makes some relationships clearer—for example, <strong>the</strong> steps that <strong>in</strong>clude two<br />
actions (plann<strong>in</strong>g and direction, analysis and production) have been separated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to dist<strong>in</strong>ct processes—but it sill leaves a number of questions unanswered. It<br />
is difficult to see from this analysis specifically who is responsible for provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>puts, carry<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> processes, and produc<strong>in</strong>g outputs; and what<br />
requirements are expected of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>puts and outputs.<br />
An important issue that this analysis only partly clarifies is <strong>the</strong> role of analysts.<br />
Nor does it demonstrate how great a burden <strong>the</strong> process places on <strong>the</strong>m,<br />
48