30.12.2013 Views

Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA

Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA

Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINDINGS<br />

selves, but <strong>in</strong> articulat<strong>in</strong>g those methods for <strong>the</strong> purpose of test<strong>in</strong>g and validat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>m and <strong>the</strong>n test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir effectiveness throughout <strong>the</strong> community. In <strong>the</strong><br />

long view, develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> science of <strong>in</strong>telligence analysis is easy; what is difficult<br />

is chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> perception of <strong>the</strong> analytic practitioners and managers<br />

and, <strong>in</strong> turn, modify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> culture of tradecraft.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g: Confirmation Bias, Norms, and Taboos<br />

Organization is key, because it sets up relationships among people<br />

through allocation and control of resources and rewards. It draws<br />

on tactical power to monopolize or parcel out liens and claims, to<br />

channel action <strong>in</strong>to certa<strong>in</strong> pathways while <strong>in</strong>terdict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> flow of<br />

action <strong>in</strong>to o<strong>the</strong>rs. Some th<strong>in</strong>gs become possible and likely; o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

are rendered unlikely.<br />

Eric Wolf 13<br />

Time constra<strong>in</strong>ts affect both <strong>the</strong> general analytic production cycle and analytic<br />

methodology by contribut<strong>in</strong>g to and exacerbat<strong>in</strong>g cognitive biases.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong>re are any number of cognitive biases to which <strong>the</strong> human m<strong>in</strong>d<br />

is susceptible, one <strong>in</strong> particular became evident dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> triangulation phase<br />

and <strong>in</strong>terpretive analysis of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview and observation data of this study.<br />

The cognitive bias identified most often was confirmation bias, which is <strong>the</strong><br />

tendency of <strong>in</strong>dividuals to select evidence that supports ra<strong>the</strong>r than refutes a<br />

given hypo<strong>the</strong>sis. 14<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> psychological mechanism by which confirmation bias occurs<br />

is <strong>in</strong> debate, confirmatory behavior is a consistent f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

experimental psychology and cognitive science literature. Ra<strong>the</strong>r than focus<br />

on <strong>the</strong> mechanism and nomenclature, <strong>the</strong> term “confirmation bias” is used <strong>in</strong><br />

this work as a description of confirmatory behavior. This behavior was<br />

13<br />

Eric Wolf was an anthropologist who focused on power, social structures, and <strong>the</strong> third world.<br />

His work on power and <strong>the</strong> lives of peasants is considered a modern anthropological classic. Eric<br />

Wolf, Pathways of Power.<br />

14<br />

There is a fair amount of disagreement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> psychological literature regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mechanism<br />

by which an <strong>in</strong>dividual displays confirmatory behavior. Some researchers attribute it to motivational<br />

factors, for example, a desire to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> respect with<strong>in</strong> a group. O<strong>the</strong>r researchers attribute<br />

it to selectivity factors, an unconscious cognitive selection of data that confirms <strong>the</strong> current status<br />

quo. Some researchers attribute it to social factors, a subspecies of groupth<strong>in</strong>k (see Irv<strong>in</strong>g Janis,<br />

Groupth<strong>in</strong>k). Still o<strong>the</strong>rs ascribe it to a misapplication of heuristics, whereby an <strong>in</strong>dividual learns<br />

a set of rules that solves one problem and <strong>the</strong>n beg<strong>in</strong>s us<strong>in</strong>g that same set of rules to try to solve<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r types of problems. Although <strong>the</strong> literature is extensive, Karl Popper’s The Logic of Scientific<br />

Discovery provides a foundation for understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> issue. Jonathan Evans’ Bias <strong>in</strong> Human<br />

Reason<strong>in</strong>g: Causes and Consequences is still a useful and concise summary of <strong>the</strong> research<br />

related to confirmation bias.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!