Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA
Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA
Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SURVEY METHODOLOGY<br />
group <strong>in</strong>cludes all those currently work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Intelligence</strong> <strong>Community</strong><br />
with more than two years of experience. The “retired” sub-group <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />
those who have spent more than fifteen years <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>telligence profession<br />
and have s<strong>in</strong>ce gone on to ei<strong>the</strong>r full retirement or o<strong>the</strong>r organizations outside<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Intelligence</strong> <strong>Community</strong>.<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> 345 <strong>in</strong>telligence professionals <strong>in</strong>terviewed, 20 percent were novices,<br />
65 percent were active, and 15 percent were retired. The active and retired<br />
sub-groups <strong>in</strong>clude senior managers.<br />
Interview Categories and Numbers<br />
Category<br />
N<br />
<strong>Intelligence</strong> Professionals 345<br />
Novice (60)<br />
Active (233)<br />
Retired (52)<br />
Academics 73<br />
Technology Researchers 53<br />
Consumers 18<br />
Total Interviewed489<br />
In order to assure anonymity for <strong>the</strong> participants, I have created broader jobrelated<br />
functional categories and associated <strong>the</strong> number of <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong>terviewed<br />
with <strong>the</strong> broader categories ra<strong>the</strong>r than l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m to specific organizations<br />
with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Intelligence</strong> <strong>Community</strong>. This is <strong>in</strong> contrast to aggregat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
agencies accord<strong>in</strong>g to each agency’s specific mission, process, or product.<br />
Although not an official member of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Intelligence</strong> <strong>Community</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Drug<br />
Enforcement Adm<strong>in</strong>istration is <strong>in</strong>cluded because of its <strong>in</strong>telligence function and<br />
resources. The table on <strong>the</strong> next page shows how I aggregated <strong>the</strong> agencies <strong>in</strong>to<br />
National-Technical, Defense, and Law Enforcement-Homeland Security categories<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> professional functions of <strong>in</strong>terview participants.<br />
10<br />
The use of two years as a divide between novice and active is derived from <strong>the</strong> total amount of<br />
experience it is possible to ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> that time. See <strong>the</strong> discussion of expertise <strong>in</strong> Chapter Five.<br />
125