Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA
Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA
Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER ONE<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />
Because I conducted human performance–related fieldwork before I came<br />
to this project, I carried <strong>in</strong>to it a certa<strong>in</strong> amount of experiential bias, or “cognitive<br />
baggage.” The research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from those o<strong>the</strong>r studies could bias my<br />
perspective and research approach with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Intelligence</strong> <strong>Community</strong>. For<br />
example, surgeons and astronauts do not need to deal with <strong>in</strong>tentionally<br />
deceptive data. Patients are not try<strong>in</strong>g to “hide” <strong>the</strong>ir illnesses from surgeons,<br />
and spacecraft are not th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g adversaries <strong>in</strong>tent on deny<strong>in</strong>g astronauts critical<br />
pieces of <strong>in</strong>formation. This one difference may mean that <strong>in</strong>telligence<br />
analysis is much more cognitively challeng<strong>in</strong>g than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two cases and<br />
that <strong>the</strong> requisite psychomotor skills are significantly less important. In an<br />
effort to counteract <strong>the</strong> biases of experience, I will attempt to be explicit about<br />
my own def<strong>in</strong>itions <strong>in</strong> this work.<br />
Work<strong>in</strong>g Def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />
The three ma<strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions used <strong>in</strong> this work do not necessarily represent<br />
def<strong>in</strong>itions derived from <strong>the</strong> whole of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>telligence literature. Although<br />
some of <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>itions used <strong>in</strong> this work are based on <strong>the</strong> Q-sort survey of <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>telligence literature described later, some are based on <strong>the</strong> 489 <strong>in</strong>terviews,<br />
focus groups, and two years of direct and participant observations collected<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g this project.<br />
3