30.12.2013 Views

Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA

Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA

Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community (PDF) - CIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DEFINITIONS<br />

Error is report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> wrong th<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

A failure is someth<strong>in</strong>g catastrophic, and an error is just a mistake.<br />

Error is about facts; failure is about surprise.<br />

Error is when nobody notices, and failure is when everybody<br />

notices.<br />

Some responses disavowed <strong>the</strong> existence of <strong>in</strong>telligence error and failure;<br />

some placed <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> broader context of policy and decisionmak<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

some <strong>in</strong>terchanged <strong>the</strong> two terms at random; some def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> terms accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir outcomes or consequences. Despite <strong>the</strong> variability of <strong>the</strong><br />

responses, two trends emerged: novice analysts tended to worry about be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

factually <strong>in</strong>accurate; senior analysts, managers, and consumers, tended to<br />

worry about be<strong>in</strong>g surprised. Often, participants’ responses were not def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

at all but statements meant to represent familiar historical examples:<br />

The attack on Pearl Harbor.<br />

The Ch<strong>in</strong>ese send<strong>in</strong>g combat troops <strong>in</strong>to Korea.<br />

The Tet Offensive.<br />

The Soviet <strong>in</strong>vasion of Afghanistan.<br />

The collapse of <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union.<br />

The Indian nuclear test.<br />

September Eleventh.<br />

The danger of def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g by example is that each case is contextually unique<br />

and can be argued ad <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itum. What is important about <strong>the</strong>se examples as a<br />

whole is that <strong>the</strong>y all <strong>in</strong>dicate one central and recurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>me. Specifically, all<br />

<strong>the</strong>se examples signify surprise—<strong>in</strong> some cases, <strong>in</strong>telligence surprise; <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

cases, military, civil, and political surprise. Even if <strong>the</strong> <strong>Intelligence</strong> <strong>Community</strong><br />

itself was not surprised by one of <strong>the</strong>se events, it was unable to conv<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

<strong>the</strong> military, civil, and political consumers of <strong>in</strong>telligence that <strong>the</strong>se events<br />

might occur; <strong>in</strong> which case, <strong>the</strong> failure was one of communication and persuasion.<br />

When I began this study, my own def<strong>in</strong>ition of error and failure derived<br />

from <strong>the</strong> psychological and cognitive discipl<strong>in</strong>es. Specifically, I took it that<br />

human error and failure are related to measures of cognitive and psychomotor<br />

accuracy, commission of error be<strong>in</strong>g at one end of <strong>the</strong> accuracy scale and<br />

omission or not perform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> correct action be<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. 6<br />

6<br />

See Appendix A for a list of literature on error.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!