20.01.2014 Views

Workshop proceeding - final.pdf - Faculty of Information and ...

Workshop proceeding - final.pdf - Faculty of Information and ...

Workshop proceeding - final.pdf - Faculty of Information and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Definition 2 The probability <strong>of</strong> target detection <strong>and</strong> reliable tracking P dT ,<br />

is defined as the probability<br />

<strong>of</strong> making a correct target detection <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> recovering a target trajectory such that each retrieved<br />

state, ( iˆ<br />

ˆ<br />

k, lk)<br />

, k = 1,... K , is within ε<br />

r<br />

cells in range <strong>and</strong> ε d<br />

cells in Doppler from the actual location, <strong>and</strong><br />

the estimated ambiguity number sequence ˆ K<br />

Μ = ( mˆ ˆ<br />

1,..., m K<br />

) is equal to the true one. Hence<br />

PdT ,<br />

= Pr<br />

⎛(<br />

max<br />

K( K, mK)<br />

V<br />

⎞<br />

⎜ Γ x ><br />

T<br />

∪<br />

dT , ⎟<br />

⎝ xK,<br />

m<br />

) E (57)<br />

K<br />

⎠<br />

where the event<br />

E dT ,<br />

is expressed as<br />

abs( iˆ<br />

k<br />

−ik)<br />

≤ ε<br />

r, abs( lˆ<br />

k<br />

−lk)<br />

≤ εd, k = 1,... K , Μˆ K = Μ<br />

K<br />

(58)<br />

It’s evident that the overall system performance depends on the choice <strong>of</strong> the tolerance factors: ε r<br />

<strong>and</strong> ε d<br />

. The smaller the tolerance factors, the larger the SNR is required in order to maintain a certain<br />

value <strong>of</strong> detection probability P d<br />

<strong>and</strong> P under a preset probability <strong>of</strong> false alarm rate. In the<br />

dT ,<br />

following, the detection <strong>and</strong> tracking performance with respect to average SNR <strong>and</strong> tolerance factors<br />

are investigated.<br />

We first consider the case that the nuisance parameters are known in advance; the corresponding<br />

−6<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the DP recursive is given in (33). In Fig.9, we set P fa<br />

= 10 , <strong>and</strong> plot P<br />

d<br />

<strong>and</strong> P versus average SNR under different settings <strong>of</strong> tolerance factor. The tolerance<br />

dT ,<br />

factor ( ε<br />

r, ε<br />

d)<br />

from up to down is (4,2) , (2,1) <strong>and</strong> (0,0) . ( ε<br />

r, ε<br />

d) = (0,0) means correct detection <strong>and</strong><br />

estimation. We note that as the tolerance factor becomes smaller (i.e., the estimation accuracy<br />

becomes higher), both P d<br />

<strong>and</strong> P dT ,<br />

decreases considerably. We can also notice that compared to P dT ,<br />

,<br />

P is less sensitive to the tolerance factor. Satisfactory detection <strong>and</strong> tracking performance can be<br />

d<br />

achieved when the tolerance factor is (4,2) .<br />

Fig. 9. P <strong>and</strong><br />

d<br />

P dT ,<br />

versus the average SNR in range-Doppler domain, with known nuisance parameters,<br />

( ε , ε ) = (4, 2), (2, 1), (0, 0) from up to down<br />

r<br />

d<br />

We now investigate the situation when the nuisance parameters are unknown; the DP recursive with<br />

−6<br />

unknown nuisance parameters is given in (50). In Fig. 10, we set P fa<br />

= 10 , <strong>and</strong> report P d<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!