21.01.2014 Views

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In de Leon's view there were two possibilities: to elevate<br />

the existing UIA, as Otlet and La Fontaine hoped, to the<br />

status of a technical organisation attached to the League,<br />

or to create a new organisation. To take either course, however,<br />

seemed to de Leon to raise two serious considerations.<br />

One was the problem of whether nations were ready for «an<br />

enterprise similar to the International Labour Bureau», the<br />

model upon which its advocates would have the new organisation<br />

based. But the greater difficulty was posed in de Leon's<br />

view, by the problems of financing the creation of a new organisation<br />

«not to speak of maintaining it on a scale commensurate<br />

with its high purpose». Moreover, he went on, «the<br />

record of the Union of International Associations shows that<br />

voluntary efforts can achieve great results and we believe<br />

that it can do more in future. Would it not be a mistaken<br />

policy to hinder these voluntary efforts by turning them into<br />

an official channel?» Other difficulties were raised by various<br />

similar proposals presently before the Council and he suggested<br />

that these matters should be referred back to the Secretariat<br />

of the League for further study and that a report be<br />

made to a subsequent meeting of the Council.<br />

The day after the adoption by the Council of de Leon's<br />

report Nitobe wrote a long letter to Otlet and La Fontaine<br />

marked «strictly confidential*, a letter which suggests that<br />

Nitobe himself may have been an influence against the Belgian<br />

plan:<br />

236<br />

The result is just what we expected ...But, as I have said before, as<br />

the secretary charged with drawing up a plan with an immediate<br />

practical end, I frankly confess your scheme of intellectual organisation<br />

strikes me still as a little in advance of time, and in talking with a<br />

number of people who know the signs of the time better than I do,<br />

I have found none who spoke in favour of adopting it at present.<br />

I think you will have to wait perhaps three or four years longer for<br />

realisation, and in the meantime let us do everything in our power<br />

to make the idea more generally known. To return to the decision of<br />

the Council, I rather looked forward to some expression of interest<br />

in, if not support of, your views from some of the members, but the<br />

only mention that was made by them was a mere reference to a letter<br />

you wrote to some of them. This is no reflection upon their interest<br />

in the scheme, I believe, but like the rest of us I think they keep<br />

silence because they think the scheme is a little premature. I hope<br />

this gloomy report will not cause you despair because I am sure that<br />

in your long concern for the cause of internationalism you have had<br />

many occasions of a more discouraging nature... I believe in some<br />

form the question will be resuscitated and grow in the near future.<br />

Speaking of gleams of hope... I believe the Council is quite prepared<br />

to continue its sympathy for the work of the university, and I imagine<br />

that it may be inclined to go a step further in assenting to give<br />

its patronage ... The Council is not ready to advise the Assembly to<br />

create a new technical organisation, but even here there is ultimate<br />

hope.<br />

At yesterday's meeting, the Council decided to take under the authority<br />

of the League even private international bureaux. Of course some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!