21.01.2014 Views

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the Belgian Senate as a Socialist member, was politically suspect<br />

and was excluded from the government of the Office. 33<br />

The results of the International Conference of Bibliography<br />

must have been gratifying to Otlet and La Fontaine. The International<br />

Institute of Bibliography was founded. The creation<br />

of a universal bibliographic repertory and the adoption<br />

and development of the Decimal Classification were approved.<br />

The International Office of Bibliography was placed under the<br />

aegis of the Belgian government and was assured of permanent<br />

support within its Department of the Interior and Public<br />

Instruction. It is true that this created some confusion, for<br />

the functions of the Office formally included those of the Institute.<br />

The original notion recommended by Otlet and La Fontaine,<br />

resolved upon by the Conference, and reported to the<br />

King by the Minister, of a documentary union of governments<br />

with the International Office of Bibliography as its permanent<br />

bureau, was lost sight of for the time being. No doubt that<br />

seemed of little importance at the time. It would have been<br />

pessimistic to anticipate conflict between the bureau of the<br />

Institute, an international organisation, and that of the Office,<br />

a national one, for while the inter-governmental treaties were<br />

lacking, neither the Institute nor the Office, as private international<br />

organisations, had any identity under Belgian law.<br />

The Office on the other hand, by virtue of its Royal Decree<br />

being both local and governmental, could assume a protected<br />

and responsible legal existence. In any case Otlet was the dominant<br />

figure in both organisations and La Fontaine was soon<br />

drawn into the formal administration of the Office by the creation<br />

of the position of Director, a staff position requiring only<br />

ministerial approval rather than the more formal approval by<br />

the King.<br />

WORK BEGINS<br />

The tasks confronting the two friends after the Conference<br />

of 1895 were prodigious. But there was already a basis for<br />

giving the OIB a satisfactory institutional shape. In the years<br />

before the Conference, the Office had been set up first in La<br />

Fontaine's study and then in the Hotel Ravenstein. A group of<br />

collaborators had assisted Otlet and La Fontaine with the<br />

development of the bibliographical repertory for law and sociology,<br />

classified so hastily according to the Decimal system<br />

for the Conference. This repertory was housed in specially des<br />

igned catalog furniture which, in a sense, constituted a foundation<br />

for the physical existence of the Office. Yet there was<br />

something tentative about it before the Conference. Its work appears<br />

to have been primarily focused upon its published bib-<br />

4—3391 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!