21.01.2014 Views

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

finally convinced Otlet and La Fontaine of its value. The<br />

Concilium Bibliographicum then became not only a member<br />

but a section of the Institute. 48 Immediately following the Conference<br />

of Bibliography the two friends set off post—haste for<br />

Dresden where the Congres Litteraire et Artistique International<br />

(the International Copyright Convention Congress)<br />

was meeting. On the agenda was a proposal by Jules Lermina<br />

for a universal bibliographic repertory. Lermina had been<br />

urging the Bureau of the Convention in Berne to set up such<br />

a repertory for a number of years. Otlet and La Fontaine<br />

hoped to encourage the Congress to support the idea, pointing<br />

out how successful they had been already in getting such a<br />

repertory underway in Brussels. The Congress appeared to be<br />

sceptical and unenthusiastic and referred the matter to a<br />

committee for study. The idea seems subsequently to have been<br />

dropped. 49<br />

In 1896, accompanied by Maurice de Wulf, Otlet and La<br />

Fontaine set off to England for the inaugural meeting of the<br />

Royal Society's Conference on an International Catalogue ot"<br />

Scientific Literature. Otlet read a long report to the Conference<br />

on the aims and methods of the IIB, and vigorously<br />

defended the Decimal Classification when objections were made<br />

to it, as they were with some spirit by John Shaw Billings<br />

and others no less eminent. The effectiveness of the Belgian<br />

delegates in promoting the IIB—OIB at the Conference was<br />

limited in several ways. There were rigid rules of procedure<br />

and a previously prepared agenda. Some preliminary inspection<br />

of IIB—OIB had already been carried out by the Royal<br />

Society in 1895 and a decision had been made then to proceed<br />

with the development of a special classification for scientific<br />

literature. Otlet was a young man, not thirty, and when<br />

compared with his colleagues both from Europe and from the<br />

Royal Society itself, by no means a distinguished scientist.<br />

The burden of presenting the case for the Decimal Classification<br />

and for collaboration between the IIB and the Royal<br />

Society seems to have fallen principally upon him. He spoke<br />

in French, though La Fontaine had a good command of<br />

English. He spoke enthusiastically, at length, and at times,<br />

out of order. But though the Conference as a whole took little<br />

notice of the Belgian demands, no member could have left it<br />

unaware of the existence of the OIB—IIB and of its program.<br />

50<br />

From London Otlet went next to Italy to take up the<br />

cause there. The Associazione Tipografico—Libraria Italiana<br />

had called an Italian Bibliographical Conference for September<br />

in Florence in order to discuss formally the Institute of<br />

Bibliography created in Brussels. More than 80 delegates<br />

attended the Conference. 51 The way was paved by an article<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!