21.01.2014 Views

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Otlet addressed the meeting on a favourite subject of his<br />

«the microphotographic book». He had been very much interested<br />

in the notion as early as 1906 and had collaborated on<br />

a paper about it then with the inventor, Robert Goldschmidt. 50<br />

In 1925 they collaborated on another paper on the subject.<br />

Otlet recognised the enormous potential of microphotography<br />

for bibliography and cataloging. He believed that it would<br />

hasten progress towards the realisation of the world network<br />

of documentation centers he had begun to speculate about<br />

because it permitted «an economy of effort in the conservation<br />

and distribution of documents in a way impossible at the moment<br />

with present means». 51<br />

During 1925 work progressed on the European version of<br />

the Decimal Classification (CD). Donker Duyvis reported to<br />

the Classification Committee meeting that year that 141 notes<br />

about changes and extensions had been exchanged. He observed<br />

that little tangible progress had been made on the unification<br />

of the American and the European versions of the Classification<br />

(DC—CD), giving as the major reason the serious<br />

illness of Dorcas Fellows. 52 During the period 1924—1925, Miss<br />

Fellows had worked hard but unwillingly on the problems of<br />

unification. Her time was limited, however, not only<br />

because of illness, but because of the work of preparation<br />

of the twelfth edition of the American version of the Classification<br />

(published in 1927) . 53 It was just at this time, and only<br />

momentarily, that unification of the two codes had become<br />

distinctly possible with the prospect of new editions of both<br />

and an expressed desire for reconciliation of differences. Donker<br />

Duyvis sent Miss Fellows proposals for expansion and modification<br />

of the CD, but because of pressure of preparing the<br />

1927 edition of the DC, and a gradually mounting distrust that<br />

became almost pathological detestation of the Europeans, 54 she<br />

had agreed to them without much if any study. In Europe,<br />

where second-hand copies of the twenty year old first edition<br />

of the CD were fetching as much as $200, 55 Donker Duyvis<br />

and Otlet were being pressed urgently for a new edition and<br />

they hastened with developments and revisions as fast as they<br />

could, accepting Miss Fellows' uncritical approval of their<br />

drafts. Indeed, Donker Duyvis decided to issue «provisional<br />

tables* in a few hundred copies of the sections most in demand<br />

as they were completed to reduce some of the pressure of demand<br />

on him. 56 The result was, of course, more divergence<br />

slowly solidifying though the 1927 American edition did incorporate<br />

some of the IIB expansions.<br />

Two major parts of the European Classification were<br />

formally published in 1925, both by the Concilium Bibliographicum.<br />

57 Herbert Haviland Field had died in 1921, and<br />

the Concilium Bibliographicum had fallen into a decline. It<br />

19—3391 289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!