21.01.2014 Views

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

THE UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION.pdf - ideals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

valuable advantages, especially, without abandoning the stability of<br />

the classification and depriving specialists of a certain latitude to<br />

develop the classification according to the needs of the various<br />

sciences. 48<br />

The Manual revealed that the various problems and difficulties<br />

that Otlet had begun to struggle with in «On the<br />

Structure of Classification Numbers», a struggle reflected in<br />

the subsequent publications of the Office, had at last<br />

been resolved. The common subdivisions were increased<br />

to six in number — form, time, relation, proper name, place<br />

and language, and a special sign was given to each. The form<br />

divisions were finally returned to parentheses, to distinguish<br />

them clearly from analytic subdivisions indicated by the intercalatory<br />

zero and to associate them clearly with the other<br />

common subdivisions. 49 The subdivision, time, was taken out of<br />

parentheses and placed between French quotation marks, «»<br />

guillemets. The «simplest form of the principal determinant*,<br />

the juxtaposition of whole numbers joined by a colon, was now<br />

simply called the «relation subdivision*. The language subdivision<br />

was reinstated and was indicated by an extended equals<br />

sign or double dash, = The geologic, place, politico-geographical<br />

subdivisions were all, as before, regarded as related<br />

and derived from the geographic tables. Geologic time was to<br />

be indicated by (1...), aspects of place or physical geography<br />

by (2...), and political geography by the well-devloped (3—9)<br />

subdivisions of the geographic tables. The extended tables for<br />

the common subdivisions were appended to the end of the<br />

Manual. The use of the various punctuation signs would, of<br />

course, make filing very difficult and a conventional filing<br />

order was established as: (), «», :, A—Z, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,5,6,7,8,9,<br />

proceeding from right to left. 50 The = sign was omitted<br />

from this formula, but was intended to follow the colon and<br />

precede the guillemets. 51 It is interesting that the plus sign<br />

( + ) was still maintained for works with multiple subjects as<br />

Otlet and Simoens had first suggested several years before —<br />

961.1+965, History of Algeria and Tunisia. In such a case the<br />

cards for the work would be filed under each number, the +<br />

sign and the number following it being ignored in filing. This,,<br />

in a sense, provided a kind of «subject tracing note», informing<br />

the user that a work on a certain subject also treated another.-<br />

But the necessity of using this sign rather than the colon and<br />

subdivisions of relation seems questionable. It was further<br />

suggested in the Manual, that the apprehension by a user of<br />

the subject display of cards in a repertory could be facilitated<br />

by the use of divisionary cards arranged according to a colour<br />

code:orange for a specific subject and subdivisions of relation,,<br />

blue for the form divisions; green for subdivisions of place;.<br />

yellow for subdivisions of time, and so on. 52 95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!