IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IGC<br />
<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2007<br />
Table 1 : Relative comparison of sensitiveness of different NDE techniques <strong>for</strong><br />
characterization of ageing behaviour in maraging steel<br />
N-Non sensitive<br />
YY-More sensitive<br />
complimentary in<strong>for</strong>mation or<br />
confirming the observation of<br />
other techniques, this enhances<br />
the use of multiple techniques<br />
and adopting multi-parametric<br />
approaches is very attractive<br />
and is expected to enable very<br />
effective characterization of<br />
microstructures. In this study,<br />
NDE parameters such as<br />
ultrasonic velocity, magnetic<br />
Barkhausen emission (MBE)<br />
RMS voltage, eddy current (EC)<br />
Fig.1 Variation in hardness,<br />
ultrasonic wave velocity, and<br />
positron annihilation life time<br />
parameter with aging at 755 K.<br />
impedance magnitude,<br />
positron life-time and X-ray<br />
diffraction based austenite<br />
volume fraction have been<br />
employed to develop a<br />
comprehensive<br />
NDE<br />
Y-Sensitive<br />
Y?-Sensitive but requries precise measurements<br />
methodology<br />
<strong>for</strong><br />
characterization of ageing<br />
behaviour of M250 grade<br />
maraging steel aged at 755 K<br />
<strong>for</strong> different durations.<br />
The variations in hardness,<br />
ultrasonic longitudinal wave<br />
velocity and positron<br />
annihilation life time with aging<br />
duration are shown in Fig.1.<br />
The variations in hardness,<br />
MBE rms voltage, volume % of<br />
austenite (XRD based) and<br />
impedance amplitude with<br />
aging duration are shown in<br />
Fig.2. Ultrasonic velocity<br />
showed good promise in<br />
characterizing the intermetallic<br />
precipitation process and was<br />
able to pick up the austenite<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation to some extent. Its<br />
drawback is with respect to<br />
obtaining any in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
about the defect structure and<br />
early detection of initiation of<br />
austenite reversion. Hence, this<br />
technique is found to be very<br />
sensitive to monitor only the<br />
intermetallic precipitation<br />
behaviour. Positron annihilation<br />
studies were found to be very<br />
sensitive to changes in defect<br />
structure during initial aging<br />
and precipitation to some<br />
extent. Fig.3 shows the bright<br />
field TEM image of defects<br />
(dislocations) in solution<br />
annealed condition. The<br />
austenite reversion has<br />
insignificant effect on positron<br />
annihilation parameter. Hence,<br />
this technique can be used <strong>for</strong><br />
high sensitive characterization<br />
of defects such as vacancies or<br />
dislocations. MBE study showed<br />
good promise in identifying the<br />
non-magnetic austenite phase<br />
compared to the intermetallic<br />
precipitation and defect<br />
structure. EC technique had<br />
shown good promise in<br />
characterizing the austenitic<br />
reversion ahead of ultrasonic<br />
and almost on par with MBE.<br />
As this technique is more<br />
amenable to shop floor, it can<br />
be used <strong>for</strong> quick and reliable<br />
determination of volume % of<br />
austenite on shop floor as well<br />
as on components. The bright<br />
field TEM image showing<br />
Fig.1 Variation in hardness, MBE rms<br />
voltage, EC amplitude and<br />
volume % of austenite determined<br />
by XRD with aging at 755 K.<br />
120 ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES