23.01.2014 Views

IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IGC<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2007<br />

Fig.1 PFBR plant layout of NICB<br />

The magnitudes of<br />

displacements and stresses<br />

developed in the structural<br />

systems depend strongly on the<br />

seismic support excitations,<br />

more precisely the floor<br />

response spectra at the support<br />

points (FRS). The dynamic<br />

characteristics of primary<br />

systems, mainly civil structures,<br />

decide the FRS. Adopting the<br />

concept of connected buildings<br />

is one of the means of<br />

mitigating<br />

seismic<br />

amplifications. Accordingly,<br />

the main buildings of nuclear<br />

island viz. reactor containment<br />

building (RCB), steam<br />

generator buildings, fuel<br />

building, control building,<br />

electrical buildings and<br />

radwaste building are<br />

connected carefully giving due<br />

considerations to safety,<br />

economy, operation and<br />

maintenance aspects. RCB<br />

houses the reactor vault which<br />

supports the reactor assembly<br />

and this apart, it contains many<br />

cells at various levels. In the<br />

connected building layout<br />

concept, the connection of<br />

reactor vault with the adjacent<br />

buildings has to be seen<br />

critically. By way of connecting<br />

the reactor vault with the<br />

adjacent cells within RCB, the<br />

reactor vault along with the<br />

reactor assembly gets<br />

connected automatically to the<br />

entire nuclear island connected<br />

buildings (NICB). NICB layout<br />

is shown in Fig.1. With this<br />

connection, the adjacent cells<br />

get support from reactor vault<br />

without calling <strong>for</strong> additional<br />

structures which helps in<br />

achieving further economy.<br />

However, the adjacent<br />

buildings can influence the<br />

seismic responses of reactor<br />

assembly components<br />

significantly.<br />

In this article, the seismic<br />

responses of reactor assembly<br />

components are quantified<br />

under the two assumptions: (1)<br />

the reactor vault is connected<br />

to the adjacent buildings of<br />

NICB through floor slabs at<br />

three levels as in PFBR (Fig.2a)<br />

and (2) the reactor vault along<br />

with reactor assembly is an<br />

isolated structural system<br />

constructed from base raft<br />

without any connection with the<br />

adjacent buildings within NICB<br />

(Fig.2b). The analysis was<br />

carried out using CAST3M, a<br />

computer code issued by CEA<br />

France.<br />

Effects on connected and<br />

isolated reactor vault<br />

The floor response spectra<br />

(FRS) generated at the reactor<br />

assembly support with and<br />

without connection are<br />

2(a) Connected<br />

2(b) Inter-connected<br />

Fig.2 Reactor assembly mounted on connected and inter-connected reactor vault<br />

R&D FOR FBRs 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!