IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IGC<br />
<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2007<br />
Fig.1 PFBR plant layout of NICB<br />
The magnitudes of<br />
displacements and stresses<br />
developed in the structural<br />
systems depend strongly on the<br />
seismic support excitations,<br />
more precisely the floor<br />
response spectra at the support<br />
points (FRS). The dynamic<br />
characteristics of primary<br />
systems, mainly civil structures,<br />
decide the FRS. Adopting the<br />
concept of connected buildings<br />
is one of the means of<br />
mitigating<br />
seismic<br />
amplifications. Accordingly,<br />
the main buildings of nuclear<br />
island viz. reactor containment<br />
building (RCB), steam<br />
generator buildings, fuel<br />
building, control building,<br />
electrical buildings and<br />
radwaste building are<br />
connected carefully giving due<br />
considerations to safety,<br />
economy, operation and<br />
maintenance aspects. RCB<br />
houses the reactor vault which<br />
supports the reactor assembly<br />
and this apart, it contains many<br />
cells at various levels. In the<br />
connected building layout<br />
concept, the connection of<br />
reactor vault with the adjacent<br />
buildings has to be seen<br />
critically. By way of connecting<br />
the reactor vault with the<br />
adjacent cells within RCB, the<br />
reactor vault along with the<br />
reactor assembly gets<br />
connected automatically to the<br />
entire nuclear island connected<br />
buildings (NICB). NICB layout<br />
is shown in Fig.1. With this<br />
connection, the adjacent cells<br />
get support from reactor vault<br />
without calling <strong>for</strong> additional<br />
structures which helps in<br />
achieving further economy.<br />
However, the adjacent<br />
buildings can influence the<br />
seismic responses of reactor<br />
assembly components<br />
significantly.<br />
In this article, the seismic<br />
responses of reactor assembly<br />
components are quantified<br />
under the two assumptions: (1)<br />
the reactor vault is connected<br />
to the adjacent buildings of<br />
NICB through floor slabs at<br />
three levels as in PFBR (Fig.2a)<br />
and (2) the reactor vault along<br />
with reactor assembly is an<br />
isolated structural system<br />
constructed from base raft<br />
without any connection with the<br />
adjacent buildings within NICB<br />
(Fig.2b). The analysis was<br />
carried out using CAST3M, a<br />
computer code issued by CEA<br />
France.<br />
Effects on connected and<br />
isolated reactor vault<br />
The floor response spectra<br />
(FRS) generated at the reactor<br />
assembly support with and<br />
without connection are<br />
2(a) Connected<br />
2(b) Inter-connected<br />
Fig.2 Reactor assembly mounted on connected and inter-connected reactor vault<br />
R&D FOR FBRs 25