23.01.2014 Views

IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IGC<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2007<br />

K Jd<br />

, MPa.m 0.5<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

9Cr-1Mo Base Metal<br />

K Jd<br />

from Inst. PCVN testing at 1.12 m/s<br />

Master Curve plotted with T 0 dy = -45 O C<br />

[ASTM E-1921(05)]<br />

Validity Limit Line<br />

0<br />

215.5 218 220.5 223 225.5 228 230.5<br />

plasticity, increase constraint<br />

and thus reduce fracture<br />

toughness. This combined<br />

effect has raised speculation<br />

regarding the adoption of the<br />

quasi static Master Curve shape<br />

even in dynamic situation and it<br />

needs to be experimentally<br />

resolved. Experimental<br />

verification of this aspect has<br />

been carried out with plain<br />

9Cr-1Mo steel. It may be noted<br />

that the 9Cr-1Mo steel is one of<br />

the candidate materials <strong>for</strong><br />

wrapper in future Fast Breeder<br />

Reactors aiming a burn up<br />

>200,000 MWD/t. To this end,<br />

predicting dynamic fracture<br />

toughness based reference<br />

dy<br />

temperature (T 0 ) is important<br />

<strong>for</strong> ensuring the integrity of<br />

critical component under<br />

accidental/dynamic loading<br />

scenario.<br />

Dynamic fracture toughness<br />

(K Jd ) of plain 9Cr-1Mo steel has<br />

Temperature, K<br />

p f<br />

=0.98<br />

p f<br />

=0.5<br />

p f<br />

=0.02<br />

Fig.2 Dynamic fracture toughness results of 9Cr-1Mo steel with respect to the<br />

ASTM E 1921 master curve<br />

been determined from<br />

instrumented impact testing<br />

with pre-crackled Charpy<br />

specimens. The dynamic<br />

loading gives rise to inertial<br />

oscillations in the specimen<br />

originating from interactions of<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward and reflected stress<br />

waves. Towards getting a load<br />

signal with minimum oscillation<br />

effects, testing has been<br />

conducted at a reduced<br />

loading rate (~1.12 m/s). The<br />

calculated stress intensity factor<br />

has been ~10 6 Mpa.m 0.5 /s,<br />

which is well regarded as a<br />

dynamic situation. It has been<br />

noticed that increase in loading<br />

rate up to 5.12 m/s, the<br />

maximum capacity of the<br />

available Charpy machine,<br />

affects the stress intensity factor<br />

rate only marginally.<br />

At temperatures of 213, 218,<br />

220.5, 223, 225.5, 228 and -<br />

dy<br />

233 K, T 0 have been<br />

determined to be 225.85,<br />

227.25, 210.91, 208.87 and<br />

209.53 K respectively. If the<br />

same invariance of the Master<br />

Curve holds good even in this<br />

high loading rate then<br />

dy<br />

theoretically, the T 0 results<br />

obtained from all the test<br />

temperatures within the DBTT<br />

regime would show the same<br />

dy<br />

values. Apparently, the T 0<br />

values show differences in the<br />

present campaign. However,<br />

taking into account the<br />

experimental uncertainties<br />

involved in a dynamic fracture<br />

toughness evaluation<br />

procedure, it is reasonable to<br />

dy<br />

say that the T 0 remains<br />

practically unchanged (±10 K)<br />

within the DBTT regime. The<br />

dy<br />

lower T 0 values at the higher<br />

test temperatures can be<br />

attributed to the loss of<br />

constraints at the crack tip.<br />

Thus, it is proposed that the<br />

same invariant shape of the<br />

Master Curve describing the<br />

fracture toughness variation<br />

under quasi-static condition<br />

also can be applied in the high<br />

dy<br />

strain rate loading. The T 0 of<br />

the 9Cr-1Mo steel is<br />

conservatively predicted as of -<br />

228 K and the same has been<br />

chosen to index the Master<br />

Curve, as shown in Fig. 2.<br />

Except a few, the individual<br />

dynamic fracture toughness<br />

data has been seen to lie well<br />

within the 98% and 2%<br />

confidence limit.<br />

R&D FOR FBRs 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!