IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
IGCAR : Annual Report - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IGC<br />
<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2007<br />
K Jd<br />
, MPa.m 0.5<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
9Cr-1Mo Base Metal<br />
K Jd<br />
from Inst. PCVN testing at 1.12 m/s<br />
Master Curve plotted with T 0 dy = -45 O C<br />
[ASTM E-1921(05)]<br />
Validity Limit Line<br />
0<br />
215.5 218 220.5 223 225.5 228 230.5<br />
plasticity, increase constraint<br />
and thus reduce fracture<br />
toughness. This combined<br />
effect has raised speculation<br />
regarding the adoption of the<br />
quasi static Master Curve shape<br />
even in dynamic situation and it<br />
needs to be experimentally<br />
resolved. Experimental<br />
verification of this aspect has<br />
been carried out with plain<br />
9Cr-1Mo steel. It may be noted<br />
that the 9Cr-1Mo steel is one of<br />
the candidate materials <strong>for</strong><br />
wrapper in future Fast Breeder<br />
Reactors aiming a burn up<br />
>200,000 MWD/t. To this end,<br />
predicting dynamic fracture<br />
toughness based reference<br />
dy<br />
temperature (T 0 ) is important<br />
<strong>for</strong> ensuring the integrity of<br />
critical component under<br />
accidental/dynamic loading<br />
scenario.<br />
Dynamic fracture toughness<br />
(K Jd ) of plain 9Cr-1Mo steel has<br />
Temperature, K<br />
p f<br />
=0.98<br />
p f<br />
=0.5<br />
p f<br />
=0.02<br />
Fig.2 Dynamic fracture toughness results of 9Cr-1Mo steel with respect to the<br />
ASTM E 1921 master curve<br />
been determined from<br />
instrumented impact testing<br />
with pre-crackled Charpy<br />
specimens. The dynamic<br />
loading gives rise to inertial<br />
oscillations in the specimen<br />
originating from interactions of<br />
<strong>for</strong>ward and reflected stress<br />
waves. Towards getting a load<br />
signal with minimum oscillation<br />
effects, testing has been<br />
conducted at a reduced<br />
loading rate (~1.12 m/s). The<br />
calculated stress intensity factor<br />
has been ~10 6 Mpa.m 0.5 /s,<br />
which is well regarded as a<br />
dynamic situation. It has been<br />
noticed that increase in loading<br />
rate up to 5.12 m/s, the<br />
maximum capacity of the<br />
available Charpy machine,<br />
affects the stress intensity factor<br />
rate only marginally.<br />
At temperatures of 213, 218,<br />
220.5, 223, 225.5, 228 and -<br />
dy<br />
233 K, T 0 have been<br />
determined to be 225.85,<br />
227.25, 210.91, 208.87 and<br />
209.53 K respectively. If the<br />
same invariance of the Master<br />
Curve holds good even in this<br />
high loading rate then<br />
dy<br />
theoretically, the T 0 results<br />
obtained from all the test<br />
temperatures within the DBTT<br />
regime would show the same<br />
dy<br />
values. Apparently, the T 0<br />
values show differences in the<br />
present campaign. However,<br />
taking into account the<br />
experimental uncertainties<br />
involved in a dynamic fracture<br />
toughness evaluation<br />
procedure, it is reasonable to<br />
dy<br />
say that the T 0 remains<br />
practically unchanged (±10 K)<br />
within the DBTT regime. The<br />
dy<br />
lower T 0 values at the higher<br />
test temperatures can be<br />
attributed to the loss of<br />
constraints at the crack tip.<br />
Thus, it is proposed that the<br />
same invariant shape of the<br />
Master Curve describing the<br />
fracture toughness variation<br />
under quasi-static condition<br />
also can be applied in the high<br />
dy<br />
strain rate loading. The T 0 of<br />
the 9Cr-1Mo steel is<br />
conservatively predicted as of -<br />
228 K and the same has been<br />
chosen to index the Master<br />
Curve, as shown in Fig. 2.<br />
Except a few, the individual<br />
dynamic fracture toughness<br />
data has been seen to lie well<br />
within the 98% and 2%<br />
confidence limit.<br />
R&D FOR FBRs 49