addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

More documents

Recommendations

Info

F.2 Uncertainty in Diesel Combustion Devices – CO 2 Emissions The diesel firing rate is the sum of the activity factors for the generators and pumps as shown in Table F-5. Table F-5. Operating Parameters for Diesel Engines Source Emergency generator IC engine Fire water pump IC engine Fuel No. of Units Unit Uncertainty Capacity (±%) a (per unit) Average Operation Uncertainty (per unit (±%) a per year) Diesel 1 ±0% units 1800 hp ±5% hr 200 hr/yr Diesel 1 ±0% units 460 hp ±5% hr 24 hr/yr; 87% load Annual Activity Factor (all Uncertainty units (±%) a combined) ±10% (hr/yr) ±10% (hr/yr); ±20% (load) 2,912 ×10 6 Btu/yr 77.7 ×10 6 Btu/yr Uncertainty (±%) a ±12.3% Btu/yr ±13.2% Btu/yr Uncertainty Estimate of Diesel Activity Data: Because the diesel emission factor is provided on a heat input basis, the equipment ratings are converted to volume of fuel consumed (V) on a heat input basis. ⎛ 1,800 hp 8,089 Btu 200 hr ⎞ ⎛ 460 hp 8,089 Btu 24 hr ⎞ V = ⎜1 Unit × × × ⎟+ ⎜1 Unit × × 0.87 × × ⎟ ⎝ unit hp-hr yr ⎠ ⎝ unit hp-hr yr ⎠ 6 6 V = (2,912+7.77)× 10 =2989.7×10 Btu/yr We assume there is no uncertainty in the number of units, which here is the count of diesel engines. The uncertainty in the unit capacity is 5%, the uncertainty in the energy efficiency of the engine is 5%, and the uncertainty in the average hours of operation is 10% based on expert judgment. The uncertainty in the CO 2 emissions is calculated by applying Equation 4-6 and using the relative uncertainty values. U ( rel) = U( rel) +U( rel) +U( rel) +U( rel) 2 2 2 2 Activity Factor Number Of Units Unity Capacity Efficiency Average Operations Urel = + + + =± ( ) 2 2 2 2 ( ) ActivityFactor 0 5 5 10 12.3% Btu/yr The uncertainty for pumps includes one additional term: the uncertainty in the percent load is 20%, U( rel) +U( rel) +U( rel) +U( rel) Urel ( ) = +U( ) ActivityFactor 2 rel Average Operations 2 2 2 2 Number Of Units Unity Capacity Efficiency Percent Load ( ) 2 2 2 2 2 ( ) ActivityFactor 0 5 5 20 10 23.5% Btu/yr Urel = + + + + =± Pilot Version, September 2009 F-6
Combining the fuel usage for the two diesel fired equipment, the total uncertainty in the diesel firing rate is calculated by applying Equation 4-4 and using the absolute uncertainty values. U ( abs) = (U( abs) +U( abs) 2 2 Diesal Firing Rate Generator Pump U abs = × × + × × = × Btu yr 6 2 6 2 6 ( ) Diesal Firing Rate (0.123 2912 10 ) (0.235 77.7 10 ) 356.85 10 / 6 356.85×10 Btu/yr 6 2989.7×10 Btu/yr ( ) Urel ( ) = 100%× = ± 11.9% Btu/yr Uncertainty Estimate of CO 2 Emissions from Diesel Combustion: E 2,989.7× 10 Btu year 0.0732 tonnes CO 10 Btu 6 2 CO = × = 2 6 2 219 tonnes CO / yr The uncertainty in the emissions factor is determined by engineering judgment to be 10%. The total uncertainty for the CO 2 emissions is then is calculated by applying Equation 4-6 and using the relative uncertainty values. 2 ( ) U ( rel) = U( rel) +U( rel ) = 11.9 + 10.0 =± 15.6% tonnes CO /yr 2 2 2 2 CO AF EF 2 F.3 Uncertainty in Stationary Combustion Devices – CH 4 , N 2 O, and CO 2 e Emissions In this hypothetical example, CH 4 and N 2 O emissions from combustion are calculated using the fuel-based emission factors presented in the API Compendium. The calculations for CH 4 and N 2 O emissions from combustion are reprinted directly from the API Compendium. Some uncertainty values were assigned as follows: • Fuel Consumption for Boilers = ±15% (assigned by expert judgment). • Heating Value of Gas Combusted = ±4% (measured independent of gas composition; assigned by expert judgment here). • Gas Composition measurement = ±4% (determined by analysis of repeat samples using techniques from Section 4; assigned by expert judgment here). • The uncertainty in the emissions factor for N 2 O is determined by engineering judgment to be +150%,–100%. The uncertainty in the emissions factor for methane is 25% based on expert judgment. Uncertainty Estimate of CH 4 and N 2 O Emissions from Boilers and Heater/Reboilers: Natural gas emission factors for CH 4 and N 2 O are based on the energy consumed by the equipment. This differs from the CO 2 emission estimates above, which were based on the volume of natural gas consumed. So, the fuel usage information from Table F-2 must first be converted to an energy input basis. Pilot Version, September 2009 F-7
Page 1 and 2:
Prepared by the LEVON Group, LLC an
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents SECTION Page FORE
Page 5 and 6:
List of Tables SECTION Page 2-1 Ove
Page 7 and 8:
FOREWORD The global oil and natural
Page 9 and 10:
DOCUMENT AT A GLANCE This document
Page 11 and 12:
1.0 INTRODUCTION Policymakers use e
Page 13 and 14:
The Intergovernmental Panel on Clim
Page 15 and 16:
2.0 SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY There ar
Page 17 and 18:
Table 2-1. Overview of Methods Used
Page 19 and 20:
the uncertainty associated with cur
Page 21 and 22:
d. Data processing uncertainty Typi
Page 23 and 24:
d. Material Balance For some emissi
Page 25 and 26:
3.0 OVERVIEW OF MEASUREMENT PRACTIC
Page 27 and 28:
3.1 Flow Measurement Practices Cont
Page 29 and 30:
All these factors should be assesse
Page 31 and 32:
Table 3-1. Example of FFMS Combined
Page 33 and 34:
3.2 Uncertainties of Flow Measureme
Page 35 and 36:
Table 3-3. Compilation of Specifica
Page 37 and 38:
EXHIBIT 3-3: FACTORS TO CONSIDER WH
Page 39 and 40:
3.3.2 Quantifying Sampling Precisio
Page 41 and 42:
Table 3-4. Summary of Selected Carb
Page 43 and 44:
3.5 Heat Content Determination The
Page 45 and 46:
3.5.2 Computational Methods Heating
Page 47 and 48:
using standard methods, non-standar
Page 49 and 50:
0.6 0.4 0.2 Error 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6
Page 51 and 52:
s ± t × (Equation 4-1) n where s
Page 53 and 54:
4.2.1 Propagation Equations There a
Page 55 and 56:
For two terms that might be correla
Page 57 and 58:
EXHIBIT 4-1: Uncertainty Example fo
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Further guidance for assigning unce
Page 63 and 64:
4.4 Quantifying Measurement Uncerta
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Are the data based on a single poin
Page 71 and 72:
Two methods are compared. The first
Page 73 and 74:
. EXHIBIT 4-6: Uncertainty Example
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Table 4-13 shows the uncertainty in
Page 79 and 80:
Table 4-13. Comparison of Annual Em
Page 81 and 82:
• The evolution of activity and e
Page 83 and 84:
These guidelines concentrate solely
Page 85 and 86:
(Reprinted from the API Compendium)
Page 87 and 88:
Table 5-2. Onshore Oil Field (High
Page 89 and 90:
associated with them are assigned b
Page 91 and 92:
Table 5-4. Onshore Oil Field (High
Page 93 and 94:
5.2.4 Propagating Assymetric Uncert
Page 95 and 96:
U( rel) = U( rel) + U( rel) + U( re
Page 97 and 98:
Coke burn rate approach (Equation 5
Page 99 and 100:
Wt% C ∑ lbmole x lbmole C 12 lb C
Page 101 and 102: The CO 2 emissions are calculated u
Page 103 and 104: GHG Emissions, tonnes/yr 60,000 50,
Page 105 and 106: vast majority of the uncertainty fo
Page 107 and 108: 6.0 REFERENCES AGA, 2008, Greenhous
Page 109 and 110: The Alberta Energy and Utilities Bo
Page 111 and 112: Appendix A GLOSSARY OF STATISTICAL
Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX B LIST OF INDUSTRY MEASURE
Page 119 and 120: Chapter 2.8B Establishment of the L
Page 121 and 122: Chapter 11.5.3 Chapter 12.1.1 Chapt
Page 123 and 124: Chapter 19.4 Chapter 20.1 RP 85 RP
Page 125 and 126: ISO 8222:2002 ISO 8697:1999 ISO 902
Page 127 and 128: ISO 7194:2008 Measurement of fluid
Page 129 and 130: ASTM D4292 ASTM D4892 ASTM D5002 AS
Page 131 and 132: APPENDIX C OPERATING CONDITIONS, IN
Page 133 and 134: Appendix C OPERATING CONDITIONS, IN
Page 135 and 136: Appendix D SELECT MEASUREMENT METHO
Page 137 and 138: c. ASTM UOP539-97, Refinery Gas Ana
Page 139 and 140: interference between known componen
Page 141 and 142: maintained over the room temperatur
Page 143 and 144: APPENDIX E UNITS CONVERSION
Page 145 and 146: − Gasoline density (average) = 0.
Page 147 and 148: Appendix F UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION D
Page 149 and 150: The uncertainty for the heaters/reb
Page 151: ∑ 2 U ( abs) = U( abs) ∑(Wt%C)
Page 155 and 156: Uncertainty Estimate of CO 2 e Emis
Page 157 and 158: U ( abs) = ( U ( abs) + U ( abs) +
Page 159 and 160: E E CO2e 219 tonne CO ⎛ 2 0.0108
Page 161 and 162: E CO 2 6 500× 10 scf gas lbmole ga
Page 163 and 164: • Fuel Economy (miles per gallon)
Page 165 and 166: Upper: U ( abs) = (U( abs) +U( abs)
Page 167 and 168: default CH 4 content is 5.53% from
Page 169 and 170: Uncertainty Estimate of CO 2 e Emis
Page 171 and 172: ( ) Urel ( ) = Urel ( ) = Urel ( )
Page 173 and 174: Uncertainty Estimate for CH 4 and C
Page 175 and 176: specific mole % for CH 4 and CO 2 i
Page 177 and 178: E CO2 0.07239 tonne CH 4 tonne mole
Page 179 and 180: U ( rel) = U( rel) +U( rel) +U( rel
Page 181 and 182: Table F-14. Fugitive Emission and U
Page 183 and 184: U ( abs) = (U( abs) +U( abs) +U( ab
Page 185 and 186: Table F-15. Onshore Oil Field (High
show all

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?