05.03.2014 Views

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXHIBIT 4-6: Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty Example for Statistical Sampl<strong>in</strong>g, cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

o<br />

The monthly CO 2 emissions factor is then calculated by apply<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g equation:<br />

6<br />

lb CTotal 44lb CO<br />

2/lbmole CO<br />

2<br />

lbTotal lbmoleTotal<br />

10 scf tonne CO2<br />

× × × × ×<br />

lb 12lb C/lbmole C lbmole 379.3 scf MMscf 2204.62 lb CO<br />

Total Total 2<br />

=55.8856 tonnes CO2/MMscf for January.<br />

o<br />

The <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> for this quantity is calculated by apply<strong>in</strong>g Equation 4-3 for the relative uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties<br />

of MW Total <strong>and</strong> wt% C Total<br />

2 2<br />

⎛UX<br />

⎞ ⎛UY<br />

⎞<br />

Urel ( ) = ⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ ⎟ = 4.13 + 5.59<br />

⎝ X ⎠ ⎝ Y ⎠<br />

2 2<br />

=6.95%<br />

o<br />

The same methods are applied to each of the monthly samples. Table 4-12 summarizes the result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

emission factors (tonnes CO 2 /MMscf) <strong>and</strong> uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties.<br />

Table 4-12. Measured Monthly Emission Factors<br />

Tonnes<br />

CO 2 /MMscf<br />

U(abs), Tonnes<br />

CO 2 /MMscf U(rel), %<br />

January 55.8856 3.8840 6.95<br />

February 55.7698 3.9276 7.04<br />

March 55.9697 3.9414 7.04<br />

April 56.1644 3.9304 7.00<br />

May 54.7437 4.1879 7.65<br />

June 55.2278 4.1441 7.50<br />

July 54.7069 4.1606 7.61<br />

August 55.4646 4.1751 7.53<br />

September 54.6648 4.1705 7.63<br />

October 54.6332 4.1647 7.62<br />

November 54.4964 4.1527 7.62<br />

December 54.8858 4.0798 7.43<br />

4.5 Aggregat<strong>in</strong>g Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty<br />

Figure 4-5 provides the decision tree for aggregat<strong>in</strong>g uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties. This diagram steps through the<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ation of activity data <strong>and</strong> emission factors to result <strong>in</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al emission estimate. It also addresses<br />

the aggregation of emissions from multiple sources, apply<strong>in</strong>g the GWP to convert non-CO 2 emissions to a<br />

CO 2 equivalent basis, <strong>and</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al summation of CO 2 equivalent emissions.<br />

An important po<strong>in</strong>t to note is that, although the GWP values reported by IPCC have correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, the GWP values are treated as constants <strong>in</strong> compil<strong>in</strong>g a facility- or entity-wide GHG<br />

<strong>in</strong>ventory. Multiply<strong>in</strong>g by a constant does not change the relative <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong>.<br />

Pilot Version, September 2009 4-29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!