05.03.2014 Views

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Are the data based on a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t measurement or multiple<br />

measurements?<br />

Multiple po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

Do the measurements<br />

represent a sampl<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

measured parameter?<br />

Yes<br />

Apply Equations 4-1 through 4-3 to calculate the mean <strong>and</strong><br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation, respectively.<br />

Apply Equation 4-8 to estimate the <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> based on the<br />

measured data, OR apply Equation 4-9 to estimate <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> for a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle observed estimate where other data is used for to quantify<br />

the <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong>.<br />

The sample st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation “<strong>in</strong>cludes contributions to the precision both from the measurement system<br />

<strong>and</strong> from the material composition variation from sample to sample” (Coleman <strong>and</strong> Steele, 1989). In other<br />

words, if the measured data for an emission source are derived from a statistical sample, the use of the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation as a measure of the spread of the data accounts for <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> of the measurement<br />

<strong>in</strong>strument <strong>and</strong> the differences among the samples. For example, if three samples are taken every month<br />

<strong>and</strong> the data for the 36 samples are used to calculate a yearly mean, the <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> calculated from these<br />

samples accounts for both the <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> <strong>in</strong> the measurement <strong>in</strong>strument <strong>and</strong> the variability among<br />

observations. Thus, this <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> will be larger than the <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> due to measurement error alone. As<br />

the sample size <strong>in</strong>creases, the <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> that comb<strong>in</strong>es the <strong>in</strong>strument error <strong>and</strong> context-specific factors<br />

will decrease.<br />

Next, we would calculate the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of the sample us<strong>in</strong>g Equation 4-1. The IPCC Good<br />

Practices document <strong>and</strong> others recommend apply<strong>in</strong>g the Equation 4-8 to quantify the <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> of the<br />

data set (IPCC, 2001), which is also referred to as the relative exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> <strong>and</strong> can be thought of<br />

as half the b<strong>and</strong>width of a 95% confidence <strong>in</strong>terval (ISO, 2005).<br />

t×<br />

s( x)/<br />

n<br />

U( rel)( x) = × 100%<br />

(Equation 4-8)<br />

x<br />

where<br />

U(Rel)(x) = the relative exp<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> <strong>in</strong> the data set (%);<br />

t = a value based on Student’s t-distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom which gives a 95%<br />

confidence <strong>in</strong>terval;<br />

x = is the mean for the set of data calculated <strong>in</strong> Equation 4-3;<br />

s( x ) = the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of the data set calculated <strong>in</strong> Equation 4-2; <strong>and</strong><br />

n = the sample size for the set of data.<br />

If one uses a s<strong>in</strong>gle observation as an estimate <strong>and</strong> uses other data to calculate the <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong>,<br />

Section A1.2.3 of the IPCC Good Practices document expla<strong>in</strong>s that Equation 4-9 should be used <strong>in</strong>stead of<br />

Equation 4-8 (IPCC, 2006). IPCC’s example application of this approach is for the use of s<strong>in</strong>gle emission<br />

estimate for a particular year that has been calculated on more than one occasion. The recalculations have<br />

Pilot Version, September 2009 4-22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!