05.03.2014 Views

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

addressing uncertainty in oil and natural gas industry greenhouse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXHIBIT 4-1: Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty Example for a Simple Emission Estimation<br />

Input Data: A <strong>gas</strong> production facility operated 45 high-bleed pneumatic devices dur<strong>in</strong>g the previous year.<br />

The average production <strong>gas</strong> composition is 80% CH 4 <strong>and</strong> 5% CO 2 .<br />

Emission Factor: The API Compendium provides a default CH 4 EF for high-bleed pneumatic devices of<br />

4.941 tonne CH 4 /device-yr ± 33.1% (Table 5-15 of the 2009 API Compendium. Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty is expressed at<br />

the 95% confidence <strong>in</strong>terval.)<br />

Emission Estimate: Emissions for this source are estimated based on the follow<strong>in</strong>g calculations.<br />

4.941 tonne CH 80 mole % CH<br />

CH : (45 pneumatic devices) × × = 226 tonnes CH /yr<br />

CO :<br />

4 4<br />

4 4<br />

device - yr 78.8 mole % CH4<br />

2<br />

226 tonne CH4 tonne mole CH4<br />

tonne mole <strong>gas</strong><br />

× ×<br />

yr 16 tonne CH4 0.80 tonne mole CH4<br />

0.05 tonne mole CO 44 tonne CO<br />

38.8 tonnes CO /yr<br />

2 2<br />

× × =<br />

tonne mole <strong>gas</strong> tonne mole CO2<br />

2<br />

Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty Assessment:<br />

Measurement Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty:<br />

o For this example, the activity data are based on a s<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t measurement. All of the devices were<br />

accounted for, so there is no bias <strong>and</strong> the <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> of the activity value (i.e., the number of<br />

pneumatic devices) is 0.<br />

o The composition measurements are based on multiple measurements represent<strong>in</strong>g a sampl<strong>in</strong>g of the<br />

composition. Equations 4-1, 4-2, <strong>and</strong> 4-3 are applied to calculate the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation of the<br />

composition samples collected throughout the year. The st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation accounts for the<br />

measurement error <strong>and</strong> <strong>natural</strong> variability of the sampled values.<br />

o For this example, the precision <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> of the composition data is assumed to be ± 1%. (A more<br />

detailed demonstration of quantify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> for measured composition data is provided <strong>in</strong> a<br />

separate example.) On an absolute basis, this equates to 0.8 for the CH 4 composition, <strong>and</strong> 0.05 for<br />

the CO 2 composition.<br />

o Bias associated with the sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> analysis is assumed to be small due to equipment<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>and</strong> calibration practices. A value of 3 % is assigned for this assessment. On an<br />

absolute basis, this equates to 2.40 for the CH 4 composition, <strong>and</strong> 0.150 for the CO 2 composition.<br />

U = U + U<br />

U<br />

U<br />

2 2<br />

Composition Data Bias Precision<br />

CH4<br />

CO2<br />

= + =<br />

2 2<br />

0.80 2.40 2.53<br />

= + =<br />

2 2<br />

0.05 0.150 0.158<br />

Emission Factor Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty:<br />

As noted above, an <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> of ± 33.1% was specified for the default emission factor. Any bias <strong>in</strong> the<br />

default emission factor is accounted for <strong>in</strong> the associated <strong>uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty</strong> value.<br />

Pilot Version, September 2009 4-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!