HCM 433 MANGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR.pdf
HCM 433 MANGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR.pdf
HCM 433 MANGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Salary<br />
Relationship<br />
Working conditions<br />
Figure 12.4 Herzbergs motivation/hygiene factors (Adpoted from White, M. (1981); Management 1 vol. 1, Study course 300, the<br />
CII Tuition service, p. 2/6).<br />
v)<br />
Mclelland Needs Theory of Motivation.<br />
In the 1960s and 70s David McClelland has examined very closely differences between individual<br />
unlike other psychologists who have studied common factors in human motivation. He<br />
contributed to the understanding by identifying three types of basic motivating needs. According<br />
to koontz and Weirich (1993) McClelland classified these basic motivating needs as the need<br />
for power (n/PWR), need for affiliation (n/AFF), and need for achievement (n/ACH). All three<br />
drives or motives – power, affiliation and achievement – are of particular relevance to<br />
management, since all must be recognized to make an organization work well.<br />
According to McClelland the best managers also have a high desire for power-power in the sense<br />
of a concern to influence and shape people and events in the direction they considered right and<br />
best. Of interest is the discovery that managers with a high need for achievement and power<br />
tended among other things:<br />
(i) To be interested in excellence for its own sake<br />
(ii) Not to work harder when money was the sole reward<br />
(iii) To judge situations on the basis of opportunities for excellence rather than<br />
prestige<br />
.<br />
Perhaps the most interesting of McClelland’s insight was that authoritarian managers (i.e. in the<br />
mode of McGregor’s Theory X) tended to have subordinates with how need for achievement.<br />
Managers of staff or employees with a high need for achievement tended to manage differently;<br />
setting high standards certainly, but also fostering an encouraging and supportive atmosphere and<br />
not being directive in telling staff exactly what to do.<br />
132