02.06.2014 Views

siemens - Public Service Commission

siemens - Public Service Commission

siemens - Public Service Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IX. Quality Assurance<br />

Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) shall be accomplished under Vendor’s<br />

internal QNQC Program. Vendor’s QNQC Program shall be submitted to PEF for review with<br />

their proposal.<br />

X. Technical Documentation and Submittal Requirements .<br />

Phase I<br />

Finalize the list of alternatives to be evaluated and obtain Alternative Evaluation List approval<br />

from PEF Project Manager. Complete the alternatives analysis and draft the Alternatives<br />

Summary Report. The selected Vendor shall work with PEF personnel to determine a<br />

recommended alternative for implementation after the alternative analysis is complete. A<br />

preliminary draft of the Phase I alternatives summary report shall be submitted to PEF for review<br />

and comment 5 days prior to final document submittal and presentation at Crystal River. The<br />

final Alternatives Summary Report shall be approved by PEF before starting the conceptual<br />

design. The final alternatives analysis will identify additional testing and information that is<br />

required in order to complete the conceptual design (i.e. underground utilities location, soils<br />

sampling, etc.).<br />

Five copies of the final Alternatives Summary Report shall be supplied to PEF.<br />

Phase I1<br />

The Vendor shall then develop a Conceptual Design of the selected alternative. The design shall<br />

have sufficient detail that the information can be used as the primary input for the detailed<br />

design. PEF personnel will supply site specific criteria for Vendor inclusion in the conceptual<br />

design document as identified below. At a minimum, the Conceptual Design will include the<br />

following:<br />

0 Provide a detailed scope description. The description should include the boundaries and<br />

interfaces with existing systems (Le., site electrical, helper and modular cooling towers).<br />

0 Identify the location(s) for installation and reason for selection, including any testing data<br />

that was used to aid in the site selection.<br />

0 Identify any exclusions or caveats that were considered during alternative selection.<br />

0 Identify applicable codes and standards.<br />

o State design conditions such as seismic loads, wind speeds, thermal and dynamic<br />

loads, system pressure and temperatures, and chemical considerations.<br />

0 Identify installation requirements that are unique to the proposed design, installation,<br />

and/or startup of the equipment. Include specific direction if field routing is not<br />

acceptable.<br />

0 Identify any assumptions made during the alternative selection.<br />

o State environmental conditions anticipated during storage, construction, and<br />

operation.<br />

o Identify environmentally sensitive areas near the construction areas. Identify the<br />

environmental permitting requirements for the construction.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!