02.06.2014 Views

siemens - Public Service Commission

siemens - Public Service Commission

siemens - Public Service Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

..<br />

Clarlflcation on the 1CS system:<br />

Attachment A to Request No. KS12007<br />

Queatlon: Is it the intent that the Integrated Control System modifications be performed in-house by<br />

PEF or other contracted entities?<br />

Answer: PEF will perform ICs modifications.<br />

ClarificatiodComment to Equipment Specification and Design Specification definition:<br />

Question: The terms Equipment Specification and Design Specification appear to be interchangeable.<br />

Are these reference terms the same in the PEF system? Please clarify if they are not the same.<br />

Answer: Design Specifications are the requirements for the component or system parameters provided in<br />

an engineering document. Equipment Specifications are the PEF Engineering Documents that are used<br />

to order equipment in accordance with EGR-NGGC-0020. Note 4 has the issuance of Equipment<br />

Specifications developed per NGGC-EGR-0020 also requires generation of an EC per EGR-NGGC -0005<br />

CIarificationlComment on the Reference to Affected Calculations:<br />

0<br />

Question: Section 1.9.14 references more than 5 calculation documents out of the -1500 calculations<br />

that will need to be revised or evaluated. Are these other affected documents to be included in the<br />

respective EC package preparation, or are the critical documents determined to be the 5 identified in the<br />

RF P with any other documents to the scope to be defined later?<br />

Answer: Additional calculations not identified within the RFP should be identified and may be bid as part<br />

of a fixed price proposal or identified that they will be addressed separately as T&M.<br />

ClarificationlComments on the schedule:<br />

Questlon: A brief review of the schedule noted that there are a number of instances where items are to<br />

be completed prior to a predecessor task being completed, or, not enough time has been allotted for the<br />

task based on a projected authorization date. A couple of examples include: the reference to the PEPSE<br />

model being completed by 9-20-07 when a typical PEPSE analysis and documentation takes 8 weeks to<br />

complete after the receipt of the turbine thermal kit. As mentioned previously, the turbine building<br />

structural evaluation is scheduled to be completed prior to the completion of the ordering and ECs for<br />

turbine items, MSRs, etc. Please clarify.<br />

Answer: A completed PEPSE Analysis was requested by the TG Vendor in order to perform the Thermal<br />

Kit Analysis. Subsequent conversations have identified that a completed PEPSE run is not required.<br />

However, the data sheet in the RFP shows what data will be required by the end of Sept to support the<br />

LP and HP turbine rotor designs, The weights of replacement components are readily available and can<br />

be provided for the Structural evaluation in order to meet desired schedule.<br />

PIIF-NCR-0 1948<br />

FWP Addendum<br />

Rcvisiori 7/27/2007<br />

#I 13343

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!